How to use the corollary (manifold version rank theorem) to prove the quoted theorem?

305 Views Asked by At

The outline is actually already given in Topics in DG by Michor. To prove the following:

1.15. Theorem. Let $M$ be a connected manifold and suppose that $f : M → M$ is smooth with $f\circ f = f$. Then the image $f(M)$ of $f$ is a submanifold of $M$.

The author proposes to find an open neighbourhood $U$ of $f(M)$ such that the derivative $T_xf$ has constant rank throughout $U$. Now I understand how this is done. But I don't know how to use the following corollary, as the author instructs, to complete the proof:

Corollary. Let $f : M → N$ be $C^∞$ with $T_xf$ of constant rank $k$ for all $x ∈ M$. Then for each $b ∈ f(M)$ the set $f^{−1}(b) ⊂ M$ is a submanifold of $M$ of dimension $\text{dim}M − k$.

I feel that he hints us to represent $f(M)$ via sets of the form of $f^{-1}(b),\,b\in f(U)=f(M)$, but I don't think it is possible. Am I missing something?

My thoughts: at each $x\in f(M)$, find a chart $(U,\phi)$ of $M$ centered at $x$, then $g: U\to M, g(y) = \phi^{-1}(\phi(f(y))-\phi(y))$ satisfies that $g^{-1}(x)=f(M)\cap U$. So $f(M)\cap U$ is a submanifold of $M$ by the corollary. Now how to get a global result?

PS I don't think this is the right track, since I feel the very purpose of introducing the rank theorem here is to avoid using charts.

PPS my thoughts are totally absurd since $g$ doesn't have the constant rank property any more, in fact it totally vanishes inside $f(M)$.


I'm NOT asking for proof of the corollary, but for how to use the corollary to prove the theorem. Thanks in advance!