We all know that ∃ means “there exists” and ∃! means “there exists exactly one”. Is there a similar notation for existence of an infinite number of examples?
2026-03-30 00:00:01.1774828801
How to write “there exists an infinite number of”?
2.5k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NOTATION
- Symbol for assignment of a truth-value?
- Does approximation usually exclude equality?
- Is division inherently the last operation when using fraction notation or is the order of operation always PEMDAS?
- Question about notation $S^c$
- strange partial integration
- What does Kx mean in this equation? [in Carnap or Russell and Whitehead's logical notation]
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- What does this "\" mathematics symbol mean?
- Why a set or vector start counting from a negative or zero index?
- How to express a sentence having two for all?
Related Questions in PREDICATE-LOGIC
- Find the truth value of... empty set?
- What does Kx mean in this equation? [in Carnap or Russell and Whitehead's logical notation]
- Exchanging RAA with double negation: is this valid?
- Logical Connectives and Quantifiers
- Is this proof correct? (Proof Theory)
- Is there only a finite number of non-equivalent formulas in the predicate logic?
- Are Proofs of Dependent Pair Types Equivalent to Finding an Inverse Function?
- How to build a list of all the wfs (well-formed sentences)?
- Translations into logical notation
- What would be the function to make a formula false?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I already suggested $\exists^\infty x P(x)$, let me try to collect some relevant links. I agree that perhaps this notation is not standard, but I have seen it often enough, and it seems a natural choice of notation to abbreviate the statement that there are infinitely many $x$ that satisfy property $P(x)$. It could be easily explained and agreed upon, at the beginning of a paper or an exposition, and then use it without danger of confusion.
A related MSE question (the most voted up answer by François G. Dorais suggests $\forall^\infty$ "for all but finitely many", and $\exists^\infty$ "there are infinitely many"). Symbols for Quantifiers Other Than $\forall$ and $\exists$
A related MO question https://mathoverflow.net/questions/74739/almost-all-quantifier (the discussion there is related to semantics and logic, rather than merely the notation).
Discussion at wikipedia (e.g. list things like $\exists^\mathrm{many}$, in the context of probability spaces,apart from formal logic discussion). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantifier_%28logic%29
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Generalized Quantifiers (does not specifically advocate the use of $\exists^\infty$ but the discussion is related): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/generalized-quantifiers/
A paper by M.Weese, uses $Q_0$ for "there exist infinitely many" http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2040997?uid=3739256&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&sid=21104634537081
I admit I didn't find as much as I wish online, to confirm that the notation $\exists^\infty$ is standard (and some of what I found was related specifically to logic, rather than to "everyday" mathematics), but I know I did not invent it, and I have seen it used in papers.