Popovici (1963) (see link), created a way to extend the Mobius function, $\mu(n)$, to the complex plane.
The Mobius $\mu(n)$ function is such that:
$\frac{1}{\zeta{(s)}}=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\mu(n)}{n^s}$
With Popovici's extension, $\mu_k(n)$, we get a generalization:
$\frac{1}{\zeta{(s)^k}}=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\mu_k(n)}{n^s}$, where $μ_k=μ∗...∗μ$ taken $k$ times on a Dirichlet convolution is Popovici’s function.
My question is..., how about $\zeta{(s)}^3$? Does his generalization of $\mu(n)$ work in this case?
And what the function $\mu_{-3}(n)$ would be in this case?
Well, let's just look at $\zeta(s)^2$ first:
$$\zeta(s)^2 = \left(1+\frac1{2^s}+\frac1{3^s}+\frac1{4^s}+\cdots\right)^2$$
So, how many times would we get the term $\tfrac1{n^2}$? Well, exactly as much as it has divisors; we would get $\tfrac1{6^s}$ exactly $4$ times because $6$ has $4$ divisors. So, we have the terms $\tfrac1{6^2}\tfrac1{1^s}$, $\tfrac1{3^2}\tfrac1{2^s}$, etcetera.
So, if $\tau(n)$ denotes the number of divisors, then $\zeta(s)^2=\sum \frac{\tau(n)}{n^2}$. Does the generalized Möbius function satisfy $\mu_{-2}(n) = \tau(n)$? From the definition wikipedia gives,
That doesn't really make any sense for $k < 0$, so I'll just say no, that generalization doesn't work for negative $n$. However, feel free to extend it even more; Popovici's generalized Möbius function isn't that well known, so you could just define your own to mean what you need.
To adress what $\zeta(s)^3$ is; the function you're looking for would be $\tau_3(n)$: more info on oeis.org/A007425.