If I want to parameterise a straight line and I have the equation, eg $y=2x+1$ and I also have two co-ordinates it passes through, would it ok to use the co-ordinates to parameterise in terms of $t$?
2026-03-28 05:21:54.1774675314
How would I parametrise a straight line?
1.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARAMETRIC
- Suggest parametric equations for a given curve
- Parametric Circle equations and intersections
- Is it possible to construct the equation of a surface from its line element?
- Finding the equation of aline in implicit form
- Finding whether a parametric curve has a well defined tangent at the origin
- Parametric representation of a cylinder generated by a straight line
- Converting circle parametric equation
- Finding the major and minor axes lengths of an ellipse given parametric equations
- Draw (2, 3) torus knot on the unwrapped torus surface
- Question about parametric, implicit equation and vector equation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Given a function $y=f(x)$, you can trivially parametrize it using $x=t$ and $y=f(t)$. Thus, a parametrization of it is $(t,2t+1)$.
It is also important to note that if you have the equation in the form $y=f(x)$, then you don't need to specify the point it goes through, since the function already determines such information.
However, if you're just given the two points, you have two options. The first is to find the equation $y=f(x)$ and then use the above trivial parametrization. The second involves directly finding a parametrization. To do this, we first find the direction vector between the two points. Say we have the two points $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$. Then the direction vector from the first point to the second is given by $(x_2-x_1,y_2-y_1)$. This gives rise to the parametrization $((x_2-x_1)t+x_1, (y_2-y_1)t+y_1)$.
It isn't hard to show that this gives rise to the same function $y=f(x)$ by eliminating the parameter, so the two parametrizations give rise to the same line.
To see this, we write $x=(x_2-x_1)t+x_1$ and $y=(y_2-y_1)t+y_1$. We take the first equation and solve for $t$ to give $\frac{x-x_1}{x_2-x_1}=t$ and then substitute into the second to give $y=\frac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}(x-x_1)+y_1$ which is exactly the equation of a line passing through the given points. Of course, we must assume that $x_2-x_1\neq 0$, otherwise this wouldn't be a function anyways.