I'm not really sure how to find the stationary distribution for the matrix $P_1$. I've tried Gaussian elimination but that doesn't seem to work. I've also tried converting it into a system of equations, but I can't seem to calculate it properly. Thanks for the help :) \begin{align} P_1=\begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{4} & 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{3}\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{4} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \frac{1}{2} & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & \frac{1}{2} & 0 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{3}\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{3}\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{4} & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{4} & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}. \end{align}
2026-03-26 03:12:45.1774494765
How would you find stationary distribution for the Markov chain defined by astochastic matrix?
49 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MARKOV-CHAINS
- Calculating probabilities using Markov chains.
- Probability being in the same state
- Random walk on $\mathbb{Z}^2$
- Polya's Urn and Conditional Independence
- Markov Chain never reaches a state
- Finding a mixture of 1st and 0'th order Markov models that is closest to an empirical distribution
- Find probability function of random walk, stochastic processes
- Generating cycles on a strongly connected graph
- Will be this random walk a Markov chain?
- An irreducible Markov chain cannot have an absorbing state
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-MATRICES
- Stochastic matrix question
- Limiting state vector of a $3$-state Markov chain
- Proving or disproving product of two stochastic matrices is stochastic
- Proving product of two column stochastic matrices is column stochastic (Proof verification)
- Decompose stochastic matrix in product of two stochastic matrices
- Examples of stochastic matrices that are also unitary?
- Cesàro limit of a stochastic matrix
- Is the Birkhoff–von Neumann theorem true for infinite matrices?
- Maximum column sum of stochastic matrix
- Prove that : There exists a vector $x$ such that $Mx = x$ , where $M$ is a Markov matrix
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The matrix you have provided is column stochastic, meaning each column sums to 1. This means that if this matrix is the transition matrix of a Markov chain, then the probability of going from state i to state j is $P_1[j][i]$. Consequently, the probability vector over the states of the Markov chain π is going to be a column vector and we will have $\pi_{t} = P_1\pi_{t-1}$.
Note that this is a bit unconventional. The transition matrix is usually taken to be row stochastic and the probability vector over the states is a row vector such that $\pi_t = \pi_{t-1}P_1$. This doesn't change the problem setting in any meaningful way, so I will adopt your convention so the explanation is easier to follow.
The stationary distribution of the Markov chain is the long-term probability distribution over states, which holds for any choice of $π_0$. Therefore we are looking for $\lim\limits_{t \to \infty}π_t= P_1\lim\limits_{t \to \infty}{π_{t-1}}$, that is, we are looking for a vector π that remains unchanged after application of $P_1$. This is the same as looking for the eigenvector $π_{\infty}$ of $P_1$ with eigenvalue 1: $P_1π_{\infty} = 1 \cdot π_{\infty}$, with the additional constraint that the elements of $π_{\infty}$ sum to 1.
Thankfully, eigenvectors are unique up to scaling, so we can just compute the eigenvector as usual and normalise it to be a valid probability distribution. Straightforward computation should yield the eigenvector $π_{\infty} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}^T$.
We then normalise to get the stationary distribution $π_{\infty} = \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0.5 & 0 & 0.5 & 0 & 0 \end{bmatrix}^T$
This should be immediately obvious if you draw the Markov chain, as states 3 and 5 form an absorbing cycle and they are also reachable from any other state meaning that eventually any walk on the chain will reach one of these nodes and will not be able to escape the cycle, thus forcing the distribution to be uniform over the involved states.