I don't understand how the adjoint operator is used in a book that I'm reading

202 Views Asked by At

I'm reading Stochastic Differential Equations in Infinite Dimensions and don't understand what the authors do in Chapter 2.3.1. Let me introduce the necessary objects: Let

  • $K$ and $H$ be real Hilbert spaces
  • $Q$ be a bounded, linear, nonnegative and symmetric operator on $K$
  • $K_Q:=Q^{1/2}K$
  • $\operatorname{HS}(A,B)$ denote the space of Hilbert-Schmidt operators from $A$ to $B$

The authors state that with $\phi\in\operatorname{HS}(K_Q,H)$ and $\psi\in H$, we've got $\phi^\ast\psi\in\operatorname{HS}(K_Q,\mathbb R)$, where $\phi^\ast$ denotes the adjoint of $\phi$.

That doesn't make any sense to me. By definition of the adjoint, $\phi^\ast$ is a bounded, linear operator from $H$ to $K_Q$. So, we should have $\phi^\ast\psi\in K_Q$.

I've noticed that the authors use a different definition of the adjoint which is introduced in Chapter 1.2. With that definition, $\psi^\ast$ is a bounded, linear operator from $H'$ to $K_Q'$, where $A'$ denotes the topological dual space of $A$. [This definition of the adjoint is usually been used for operators between Banach spaces; I don't understand why they use it here].

However, that still doesn't make sense to me. I don't even see that $\phi^\ast\psi$ is a well-defined expression.

So, what do the authors mean?