I have an integral scheme $X$, and two coherent ideal sheaves $\mathcal I$ and $\mathcal J$ on $X$. I know there is a (maybe not closed) point $x$ of $X$ such that $\mathcal I$ and $\mathcal J$ define the same ideal sheaf in the stalk $\mathcal O_{X,x}$. Does it follow that there exists an open set $U$ containing $x$ such that $\mathcal I\vert_U = \mathcal J\vert_U$? I'm having trouble translating this into commutative algebra.
2026-04-03 02:10:30.1775182230
Ideals agreeing in a localization
66 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-GEOMETRY
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- An irreducible $k$-scheme of finite type is "geometrically equidimensional".
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Is there a variant of the implicit function theorem covering a branch of a curve around a singular point?
- Singular points of a curve
- Find Canonical equation of a Hyperbola
- Picard group of a fibration
- Finding a quartic with some prescribed multiplicities
Related Questions in COMMUTATIVE-ALGEBRA
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Example of simple modules
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- $k[[x,y]]/I$ is a Gorenstein ring implies that $I$ is generated by 2 elements
- There is no ring map $\mathbb C[x] \to \mathbb C[x]$ swapping the prime ideals $(x-1)$ and $(x)$
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Principal Ideal Ring which is not Integral
Related Questions in IDEALS
- Prime Ideals in Subrings
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- Product of Ideals?
- Let $L$ be a left ideal of a ring R such that $ RL \neq 0$. Then $L$ is simple as an R-module if and only if $L$ is a minimal left ideal?
- Show $\varphi:R/I\to R/J$ is a well-defined ring homomorphism
- A question on the group algebra
- The radical of the algebra $ A = T_n(F)$ is $N$, the set of all strictly upper triangular matrices.
- Prove that $\langle 2,1+\sqrt{-5} \rangle ^ 2 \subseteq \langle 2 \rangle$
- $\mathbb{Z}[i] / (2+3i)$ has 13 elements
- Ideal $I_p$ in $\mathbb{F}_l[x]/(x^p -1)$ where $\frac{\epsilon p}{2} \leq \dim(I_p) < \epsilon p$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Because of Hartshorne's (not so great ...) book, the word "coherent" is often not used in its proper meaning. Coherent modules are defined as finitely generated modules whose finitely generated submodules are finitely presented. Thus, coherent modules are finitely presented and finitely presented modules are finitely generated, but over a non-noetherian base all these notions may differ. Over a non-noetherian base, being finitely presented is often the most natural finiteness condition. For ideals, being of finite type often suffices (in fact, if $I \subseteq \mathcal{O}_X$ is of finite type then $\mathcal{O}_X/I$ is of finite presentation). This is also the case here.
Let $X$ be an arbitrary ringed space. Let $I,J \subseteq \mathcal{O}_X$ be ideals of finite type with $I_x=J_x$ for some point $x \in X$. Choose generators $s_1,\dotsc,s_n \in \Gamma(W,I)$ of $I|_W$ for some open neighborhood $W$ of $x$. Then $(s_1)_x,\dotsc,(s_n)_x$ lie in $I_x=J_x$. It follows that there is some open neighborhood $U \subseteq W$ of $x$ such that $s_1|_U,\dotsc,s_n|_U$ lie in $\Gamma(W,J)$. (For each $s_i$ we find one and then we intersect; here we use the finiteness!) Since $s_1|_U,\dotsc,s_n|_U$ generate $I|_U$, we see $I|_U \subseteq J|_U$. Similarly, we find some open neighborhood $V$ of $x$ with $J|_V \subseteq I|_V$. Thus, $I$ and $J$ agree on $U \cap V$.