Given the ring $A$ is commutative with an identity element.
If $A$ is absolutely flat (i.e. each $A$-module is flat) then every primary ideal is maximal.
This exercise 4.3 comes from the classical text of Atiyah-Macdonald : introduction to the commutative algebra.
Attempt:
Suppose $\mathfrak{q}$ is a primary ideal in $A$ and fix an $x\in A-\mathfrak{q}.$ Then $\bar{x}\in A/\mathfrak{q}$ is non-zero since $x\not\in\mathfrak{q}$
Recall that $A$ is absolutely flat $\Longleftrightarrow$ every principal ideal is idempotent.
Then as $x\in\langle x\rangle=\langle x^{2}\rangle$, we have $x=ax^{2}$ for some $a\in A$ and hence $x(ax-1)=0\in\mathfrak{q}$ and we thus have $(ax-1)^{n}\in\mathfrak{q}$ for some integer $n>0$ since $x\not\in\mathfrak{q}.$
Therefore, we get that $(ax-1)^{n}=\bar{0}$ in $A/\mathfrak{q}$. It follows that $\bar{a}\bar{x}-\bar{1}\in A/\mathfrak{q}$ is nilpotent and thus $\bar{a}\bar{x}=(\bar{a}\bar{x}-\bar{1})+\bar{1}\in A/\mathfrak{q}$ is unit which implies $\bar{x}\in A/\mathfrak{q}$ is unit. Therefore, $A/\mathfrak{q}$ is a field. It follows that $\mathfrak{q}$ must be a maximal ideal in $A$.
I am not very sure if my proof is valid. Any suggestion or comment I will be grateful.
This is a perfect proof, and very neatly written. Obviously, you are on a level where you no longer need this kind of supervision. You can determine if a proof is correct or not.
Or is there a particular point in the proof that you are uncertain about?