Let $E \simeq M \times \mathbb C$ be a trivial smooth complex line bundle over the Riemann surface $M$ and let $S \colon M \to E$ be its smooth nowhere vanishing section. Let $\nabla^1$ and $\nabla^2$ be two covariant derivatives on $E$, then $$ \nabla^1 S=S \otimes X^1,\\ \nabla^2 S = S \otimes X^2, $$ where $X^1$, $X^2 \in \Omega^1(M)$ are called the connections' one-forms. It is stated that if $dX^1 = dX^2$ then curvatures of $\nabla^1$ and $\nabla^2$ are the same. I tried to show this by definition but I have a problem. Let $U$, $V \in \Gamma(TM)$, $f \in C^\infty(M)$. Then $$ \nabla^1_U \nabla^1_V (fS) = \nabla^1_U ( (V(f)+fX^1(V))S) \\ = \bigl( U(V(f))+U(f)X^1(V)+fU(X^1(V)) + X^1(U)(V(f)+fX^1(V)) \bigr)S $$ and hence $$ \nabla^1_U \nabla^1_V(fS)-\nabla^1_V \nabla^1_U(fS) \\ = \bigl([U,V](f)+fU(X^1(V))-fV(X^1(U)) \bigr)S, $$ and then $$ R^1(U,V)(fS) = \nabla^1_U \nabla^1_V(fS)-\nabla^1_V\nabla^1_U(fS)-\nabla^1_{[U,V]}(fS) \\ = \bigl( U(X^1(V))-V(X^1(U))- X^1([U,V])\bigr)fS $$ But how to show that this expression depends only on $dX^1$?
2026-03-31 20:28:02.1774988882
If $dX_1 = dX_2$ then curvatures of $\nabla^{X_1}$ and $\nabla^{X_2}$ agree
57 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in RIEMANN-SURFACES
- Composing with a biholomorphic function does not affect the order of pole
- open-source illustrations of Riemann surfaces
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
- Reference request for Riemann Roch Theorem
- Biholomorphic Riemann Surfaces can have different differential structure?
- Monodromy representations and geodesics of singular flat metrics on $\mathbb{H}$
- How to choose a branch when there are multiple branch points?
- Questions from Forster's proof regarding unbranched holomorphic proper covering map
- Is the monodromy action of the universal covering of a Riemann surface faithful?
- Riemann sheets for combined roots
Related Questions in VECTOR-BUNDLES
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Confusion about relationship between operator $K$-theory and topological $K$-theory
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- Scheme theoretic definition of a vector bundle
- Is a disjoint union locally a cartesian product?
- fiber bundles with both base and fiber as $S^1$.
- Is quotient bundle isomorphic to the orthogonal complement?
- Can We understand Vector Bundles as pushouts?
- Connection on a vector bundle in terms of sections
Related Questions in CURVATURE
- Sign of a curve
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
- CAT(0) references request
- Why is $\kappa$ for a vertical line in 2-space not undefined?
- Discrete points curvature analysis
- Local computation of the curvature form of a line bundle
- Closed surface embedded in $\mathbb R^3$ with nonnegative Gaussian curvature at countable number of points
- What properties of a curve fail to hold when it is not regular?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
There is the following formula for the exterior derivative that you should get to know (it comes up a lot): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exterior_derivative#Invariant_formula.
In the case of a 1-form $\mu$, it says that $$ d\mu(U,V) = U\cdot \mu(V) - V \cdot \mu(U) - \mu([U,V]). $$ Therefore the last thing you wrote is exactly $dX^1(U,V)$.
This formula can be proved using Cartan's formula: $$ d i_U \mu + i_U d \mu = L_U \mu. $$ Rearranging gives $$ i_U d\mu = L_U \mu - d(\mu(U)). $$ Now apply to a vector field $V$ and get $$ d\mu(U,V) = (L_U \mu)(V) - V\cdot \mu(U). $$ Now we use the fact that the Lie derivative satisfies the product rule: $$ U\cdot (\mu(V)) = L_U (\mu(V)) = (L_U \mu)(V) + \mu(L_U V) = (L_U \mu)(V) + \mu([U,V]). $$ So $(L_U \mu)(V) = U\cdot(\mu(V)) - \mu([U,V])$, as desired.