If the derivative of a function is irrational does it follow that the original function is irrational?

80 Views Asked by At

I'm in my final year of secondary school in Ireland and was thinking about powers of irrational numbers with rational solutions and very quickly noticed that $(x^\frac{1}{a})^a$ where $x\in Q$ and $a \notin Q$ was always rational.

I wanted to prove that $x^\frac{1}{a} \notin Q$

And this was as far as I got

$$ f(x) = x^b,\ \ x\in Q,\ \ b\notin Q, \ \ x\ne0\\ f'(x) = bx^{b-1}\\ \therefore \ \ f'(x) \notin Q $$

if I can deduce from that $f(x)$ is also irrational then I can deduce that $x^\frac{1}{a} \notin Q$ where $x\ne0$

In my head this should be fine as if the function always changes by an irrational number it should ultimately be irrational, but I cant find a way too prove it, or a source verifying this.

Am I allowed make that deduction and is there anything else flawed in my reasoning?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

3
On BEST ANSWER

The statement that $x \in \mathbb{Q}$, and $a \notin \mathbb{Q}$ implies $x^{\frac{1}{a}} \notin \mathbb{Q}$ is false. Here's a counter-example:

Let $$ x = 2, a = \frac{1}{\log_2(3)} $$

Then $x \in \mathbb{Q}$ and $a \notin \mathbb{Q}$, but $$ \begin{eqnarray} x^{\frac{1}{a}} =& 2^{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{\log_2(3)}}}\\ =& 2^{\log_2(3)} \\ =& 3 \\ \in& \mathbb{Q} \end{eqnarray} $$