If $w$ is an involution on an n-dimensional space, $det(w) = (-1)^r$ where $r$ is the rank of the map $i - w$

329 Views Asked by At

In the book of Linear Algebra by Werner Greub, at page 109, it is asked that

Let $w$ be a linear transformation of $E$ such that $w^2 = i$.Show that $det (w) = (-1)^r$ where $r$ is the rank of the map $i - w$.

I thought since $w$ is an involution, it will map every element in the image to itself, so the map $i-w$ will only give map elements to nonzero image that are not mapped to itself in the first place.

However, after I couldn't move much, so how can I continue ?

Any help would be appreciated.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

7
On BEST ANSWER

Elaborating a bit on Lord Shark's answer (+1). Also proffering a way to do this without using eigenvectors explicitly.

We can write any vector $v\in E$ as a sum (think: writing a function as a sum of its even and odd parts) $$ v=\frac12(v+w(v))+\frac12(v-w(v)).\qquad(*) $$ Here (the proof is an exercise) the former part belongs to the subspace $$ E_1=\{x\in E\mid w(x)=x\} $$ and the latter part belongs to the subspace $$ E_2=\{x\in E\mid w(x)=-x\}. $$ Claim. $E=E_1\oplus E_2.$

Proof. Clearly $E_1\cap E_2=\{0_E\}$, so the subspace sum $E_1+E_2$ is direct. By the decomposition $(*)$ the sum is all of $E$. QED

Clearly the linear transformation $i-w$ kills all of $E_1$, but it doubles all the elements of $E_2$. Therefore the rank of $i-w$ is equal to the dimension of $E_2$.

OTOH the direct sum decomposition means that we get a basis of $E$ as a union of bases for the subspaces $E_1$ and $E_2$. With respect to such a basis the matrix of $w$ has $+1$s along the diagonal while we are in $E_1$ and $-1$s while in $E_2$. The number of $-1$s is equal to $\dim E_2$. The claim follows.

1
On

No, you are thinking about projection maps, those satisfying $w^2=w$, not involutions, satisfying $w^2=I$. An involution is diagonalisable, and its possible eigenvalues are $1$ and $-1$.