I will prove that I attempted this math by listing the things that I know.
- $y=2z$
- $x=2z^2$
- $x=yz$
Also, did you notice something? If $x=8, y=4,z=2$ then everything works out.
I figured this while attempting the math.
But the problem is I don't know how to justify my hypothesis. That's why I'm asking the question.
If there's any problem in my question please inform me.
$x:y = 2:1$ so $x = 2y$.
$y:z = 2:1$ so $y = 2z$.
So $x = 2y = 2(2z) = 4z$ and so $x:z = 4: 1$ and $z:x = 1:4$.
So $ii$ is true.
Does $y^2 + xy = 4xy$? Well, $y^2 = (2z)^2 = 4z^2$ and $xy = (4z)(2z) = 8z^2$ so $y^2 + xy = 4z^2 + 8z^2 = 12z^2$. Meanwhile $4xy = 4(4z)(2z) = 32z^2$. Does $12z^2 = 32z^2$? Only if $z= 0$, which it can not as $y:z = 2:1$. So $iii$)
What about $i$? $x,y,z$ are quantuum porpoises[1]? I don't know what that means. But and $ii$ is true and $iii$ is false that means 1) is the only possible option.
True.
False.
What the .....???????
====
[1] Does "continued proportional" mean that $x:y = y:z$? Well, as $x:y = 2:1$ and $y:z = 2:1$ that is simply true. There's nothing to argue. It's just true.