Let $X,Y$ be a Polish space, $A\subset X$ a Borel subset and $f:A \to B\subset Y$ a homeomorphism. Is $B$ then still Borel in $Y$ ?
2026-03-25 20:10:55.1774469455
image of homeomorphism Borel?
62 Views Asked by user679342 https://math.techqa.club/user/user679342/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in BOREL-SETS
- Prove an assertion for a measure $\mu$ with $\mu (A+h)=\mu (A)$
- $\sigma$-algebra generated by a subset of a set
- Are sets of point convergence of Borel functions Borel?
- Can anyone give me an example of a measurable subset of the interval [10,100], that is not a Borel set.
- If $A \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ satisfies $m^\ast(A) = 0$, then there exist $B, C ∈ \mathcal{B}(\mathbb{R})$ such that $A = B \setminus C$?
- Why is the sigma algebra generated by the set of all closed subsets a subset of the Borel sigma algebra on $\mathbb{R}$?
- Permutation of binary expansion on (0,1)
- Kernel of finitely additive function on $\mathbf{N}$ and Borel sets
- Induced Borel $\sigma$-algebra.
- Does set with Lebesgue-Mass nonzero have almost surely an open subset
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Short answer: yes.
Long answer:
Recall $(X,\Sigma)$ is Standard Borel if $\Sigma$ is the $\sigma$-algebra coming from the borel sets of a polish topology (analogous to a polish topology being the open sets coming from some separable complete metric).
If $X$ and $Y$ are Standard Borel spaces, $f : X \to Y$ is Borel, and $f \upharpoonright A$ is injective, then $f[A]$ is Borel.
In your case $X$ and $Y$ are Polish, in particular standard borel, so if $f \upharpoonright A$ is injective, $f[x] = B$ is borel. Thankfully, $f$ is a homeomorphism, so it is (among other things) injective and borel.
Longer Answer:
This theorem is true because of a fact in descriptive set theory, namely $B$ is Borel if and only if it is the continuous, injective image of (a closed subset of) Baire Space.
To prove the above theorem, then, we write $A = g[C]$ for $C$ a closed subset of Baire Space and $g$ injective. Now $B = f[A] = fg[C]$ is also an injective image of a closed subset of Baire Space.
Proving that borel sets are exactly continuous injective images of closed subsets of Baire Space is somewhat hard, but it can be found in any good descriptive set theory reference.
Because I can't help myself:
The theorem would be true even if $f$ were just injective and borel! Homeomorphism-ness is very strong, so it makes sense that $B$ should be borel in that setting, but it seems surprising we should be able to get away with so little. The solution is one of my favorite tricks in mathematics, so I feel obligated to mention it here. Often we fix topologies, and try to find functions which behave nicely. Rarely do we fix a function and try to find topologies under which it behaves nicely! However here we have the opportunity to do exactly that!
If $X$ and $Y$ are polish, and $f : X \to Y$ is borel, then we can find a new polish topology on $X$ (with the same borel sets!) rendering $f$ continuous. We then use the characterization of borel sets above to conclude. If you are interested in the actual construction of the new topology (which is quite easy to comprehend), I recommend this article, which does quite a good job explaining it.