I have been given the following Question, I literally have no Idea where to start with it, I understand that the original expression comes from central difference approximation, that makes sense. I know what Richardson extrapolation is, but I am just struggling to understand how to combine the two.
2026-03-25 19:03:36.1774465416
Improving accuracy of f''(x) by Richardson extrapolation
274 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in APPROXIMATION
- Does approximation usually exclude equality?
- Approximate spline equation with Wolfram Mathematica
- Solving Equation with Euler's Number
- Approximate derivative in midpoint rule error with notation of Big O
- An inequality involving $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\sqrt{\sin x}\:dx $
- On the rate of convergence of the central limit theorem
- Is there any exponential function that can approximate $\frac{1}{x}$?
- Gamma distribution to normal approximation
- Product and Quotient Rule proof using linearisation
- Best approximation of a function out of a closed subset
Related Questions in EXTRAPOLATION
- When extrapolating for projections, how do you know which function-form to use?
- Trying to use Taylor series to find a formula for a Richardson extrapolation of order 6
- How to find more accurate numerical integration result using Richardson's Extrapolation given midpoint and trapezoidal conditions?
- Norm of laplacian in dual space $H^{-2}$
- Please explain how Richardson Extrapolation is used in this example
- Extrapolation of points by a function
- How to find a formula relating three values?
- How can I derive the dense output of ode45?
- Numerical Analysis - $n$-sided polygon tangential
- Propagating Uncertainties on Interpolated Data
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I will derive the necessary error expansion as well as a formula for the 4th order accurate approximation.
Let $I = (a,b) \subseteq \mathbb R$ be an open interval. Let $f : I \rightarrow \mathbb R$ by six times differentiable. Let $x \in (a,b)$ and let $h_0 > 0$ be such that $(x-h_0,x+h_0) \subseteq I$. Let $0 < |h| \leq h_0$. By Taylor's theorem there exists $\xi$ between $x$ and $x+h$ such that $$ f(x+h) = f(x) + f'(x)h + \frac{1}{2} f''(x) h^2 + \frac{1}{6} f^{(3)}(x)h^3 + \frac{1}{24} f^{(4)}(x)h^4 + \frac{1}{120} f^{(5)}(x)h^5 + \frac{1}{720} f^{(6)}(\xi)h^6. $$ Similiarly, there exists $\nu$ between $x$ and $x-h$ such that $$ f(x-h) = f(x) - f'(x)h + \frac{1}{2} f''(x) h^2 - \frac{1}{6} f^{(3)}(x)h^3 + \frac{1}{24} f^{(4)}(x)h^4 - \frac{1}{120} f^{(5)}(x)h^5 + \frac{1}{720} f^{(6)}(\nu)h^6. $$ It follows, that $$ \frac{f(x+h)-2f(x)+f(x-h)}{h^2} = f''(x) + \frac{1}{12} f^{(4)}(x)h^2 + \frac{1}{360} \frac{f^{(6)}(\xi) + f^{(6)}(\nu)}{2} h^4$$ Equivalently, the difference between the target $T = f''(x)$ and the approximation $A_h$ given by $$A_h = \frac{f(x+h)-2f(x)+f(x-h)}{h^2} $$ satisfies $$ \left | T - A_h - \frac{1}{12} f^{(4)}(x)h^2 \right | \leq \frac{1}{360} \sup \left\{ |f^{(6)} (z)| \: : x - h_0 \leq z \leq x + h_0 \right \} h^4. $$ If $f^{(6)}$ is continuous, then we are certain that the right hand side is finite. This rigorously establishes that $$ T - A_h = \alpha h^2 + O(h^4), \quad 0 \leq |h| \leq h_0$$ where $\alpha = \frac{1}{12} f^{(4)}(x)$ is independent of $h$.
Now the path is clear. We have $$ T - A_{2h} = 4 \alpha h^2 + O(h^4), \quad 0 \leq |h| \leq \frac{1}{2} h_0. $$ It follows that $$ A_{h} - A_{2h} = 3 \alpha h^2 + O(h^4), \quad 0 \leq |h| \leq \frac{1}{2} h_0.$$ Equivalently, the dominant error term $\alpha h^2$ satisfies $$ \alpha h^2 = \frac{A_h - A_{2h}}{3} + O(h^4), \quad 0 \leq |h| \leq \frac{1}{2} h_0.$$ It follows $$ T - A_h = \frac{A_h - A_{2h}}{3} + O(h^4), \quad 0 \leq |h| \leq \frac{1}{2} h_0.$$ This shows that, the approximation $$ M_h = A_h + \frac{A_h - A_{2h}}{3}$$ is 4th order accurate.
It may or may not be interesting to express this approximation directly in terms of $f$, but I would always evaluate $M_h$ as stated, i.e., a good approximation $A_h$ plus a small correction, i.e., $\frac{A_h - A_{2h}}{3}$.