I read that every local ring is clean so there exist clean rings with nonzero nilpotent ideals, i know that a local ring has a unique maximal ideal, but i don't know why do they say this implication.
thank you.
I read that every local ring is clean so there exist clean rings with nonzero nilpotent ideals, i know that a local ring has a unique maximal ideal, but i don't know why do they say this implication.
thank you.
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
Ridiculous of course, since there are lots of local integral domains.
Because it is easy to produce local rings with nilpotent ideals, witnessing this statement. $\mathbb Z/ 4\mathbb Z$ is local with a nilpotent maximal ideal. Thus it is local, clean, and has such an ideal.
—-
Based on the above, it sounds like you misunderstood the strategy of quantification. The claim only asserted “$\exists$ clean ring with nonzero nilpotent ideal” but you interpreted its solution as “$\forall$ local ring, local ring has nonzero nilpotent ideal, hence $\exists$ a clean ring like that.” Really it is already sufficient that “$\exists$ local ring such that it has nonzero nilpotent ideal, hence $\exists$ a clean ring like that.”