I'm studying proofs by induction and I wonder if what I did constitutes a solid proof or not. I know the three steps to conduct an inductive proof, so I will write down what I did.
Base case: n=1
$2^1\geq 1+1 $ :Correct because 2 equals 2.
Inductive hypothesis: Let n=k $\implies 2^k\geq 1+k $: assume as true.
Inductive Step: n=k+1
We get that:
$2^{k+1} \geq 1+(k+1)\implies 2^{k+1}\geq k+2.$ Rewriting $2^{k+1}$ we get $2^k.2^1 \geq k+2.$
We know (assumed) that$ 2^k \geq k+1 $ so multiplying both sides by 2 we get: $2^k.2 \geq 2(k+1)$. Since $2(k+1) $ is larger than $k+2$, we can conclude that $2^k.2\geq k+2$, which is what we wanted to prove in the first place.
Does that hold? I'm specifically doubtful about the multiplication by 2 part. Can I do that?
Thanks for any help.
Assume:
$2^{k} \geq 1+k$
Multiply by 2:
$2^{k+1} \geq 2 + 2k > 1 + (k+1)$