I would like to ask about the inertia group of primes in the cyclotomic field extension. Indeed, let $n=p_{1}\cdots p_{k}$ for some distinct odd primes and let $K = \mathbb{Q}(\zeta_{n})$ so the Galois group of $K/\mathbb{Q}$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{F}_{p_{1}}^{\times}\times\cdots\times\mathbb{F}_{p_{k}}^{\times}$ via CRT. I think the inertia group of a prime ideal $\mathfrak{p}$ over some prime $p_{i}$ is $1\times\cdots\times \mathbb{F}_{p_{i}}^{\times}\times\cdots\times 1$ under the above identification, but how can I show this rigorously?
2026-03-25 14:23:54.1774448634
Inertia groups of cyclotomic field extension
655 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-NUMBER-THEORY
- Splitting of a prime in a number field
- algebraic integers of $x^4 -10x^2 +1$
- Writing fractions in number fields with coprime numerator and denominator
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Introduction to jacobi modular forms
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Find the degree of the algebraic numbers
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- Direct product and absolut norm
- Splitting of primes in a Galois extension
Related Questions in RAMIFICATION
- Splitting of primes in a Galois extension
- Geometric interpretation of ramification of prime ideals.
- Which primes are ramified?
- What is $[O_{L}:O]$ and $[O_{L}/(\pi):O/(\pi)]$?
- Ramification Groups without valuations
- algebraic curve's branchpoints
- Maximal Totally Ramified Extension
- Prime ramification on cyclotomic fields
- Lagrange interpolation with multiplicities
- A doubt on solvable groups and algebraic Number Theory
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I would try the following. The field $K$ is the compositum of the fields $K_i=\Bbb{Q}(\zeta_{p_i})$, $i=1,2,\ldots,k$. The extensions $K_i/\Bbb{Q}$ are all Galois, and they are linearly disjoint (jointly, i.e. any two compositums without a common factor are linearly disjoint). BTW, this is one way of arriving at your CRT isomorphism. The rational prime $p_i$ is unramified in all the extensions $K_j/\Bbb{Q}$, $j\neq i$, so it is unramified in their compositum $$\hat K_i:=\prod_{j\neq i}K_j.$$ But $p_i$ is totally ramified in $K_i/\Bbb{Q}$, and as $[K:\hat K_i]=[K_i:\Bbb{Q}]=p_i-1=e(\mathfrak{p}|p_i)$, it follows that all the primes abov $p_i$ are totally ramified in $K/\hat K_i$. These facts means that $\hat K_i$ is the inertia field of all primes $\mathfrak{p}$ above $p_i$. Note that as $K$ is an abelian extension of the rationals, the conjugate prime ideals share the same inertia field.
The subgroup $1\times \cdots \times \Bbb{F}_{p_i}^{\times}\times\cdots\times 1$ is the group that Galois correspondence applied to $K/\Bbb{Q}$ associates with the field $\hat K_i$, so the claim follows from this.