One direction is clear, a Kan complex has all its morphisms invertible hence it is an $\infty$-groupoid.
Is it possible to show the opposite as a Corollary of the following theorem?
Theorem. Let $p:X\to Y$ an isofibration between $\infty$-categories. For any monomorphism $i:A\hookrightarrow B$ in sSet, the canonical induced map $$K(B,X)\to K(A,X)\times_{K(A,Y)} K(B,Y)$$ is a Kan fibration between Kan complexes.
Here $K(B,X)=\{f:\Delta^n\times B\to X| \forall b\in B,f_b\in X^\simeq_n\}$
As a special case, one can see that any $K(B,X)$ is a Kan-complex. But how do we proceed and see that every $\infty$-groupoid is indeed a Kan complex?
2026-03-30 00:16:27.1774829787
$\infty$-groupoids = Kan complexes
312 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Related Questions in HOMOTOPY-THEORY
- how to prove this homotopic problem
- Are $[0,1]$ and $(0,1)$ homotopy equivalent?
- two maps are not homotopic equivalent
- the quotien space of $ S^1\times S^1$
- Can $X=SO(n)\setminus\{I_n\}$be homeomorphic to or homotopic equivalent to product of spheres?
- Why do $S^1 \wedge - $ and $Maps(S^1,-)$ form a Quillen adjunction?
- Is $S^{n-1}$ a deformation retract of $S^{n}$ \ {$k$ points}?
- Connection between Mayer-Vietoris and higher dimensional Seifert-Van Kampen Theorems
- Why is the number of exotic spheres equivalent to $S^7,S^{11},S^{15},S^{27}$ equal to perfect numbers?
- Are the maps homotopic?
Related Questions in SIMPLICIAL-STUFF
- Homotopy type of simplicial complexes
- $\Pi_f$ for a morphism $f$ between simplicial sets
- Trouble with changing the fractions into matrix-vector from
- A fibration $p : E \rightarrow X$ is trivial iff $p$ is a homotopy equivalence
- Quillen equivalence between sSet (Joyal's model structure) and sSetCat (Bergner's one)
- The choice of cofibrant approximation is contractible
- Do Homotopy limits commute with right Quillen functors
- Necessary conditions for a Reedy fibrant diagram
- $\infty$-categories definition disambiguation
- For simplicial abelian group quotient map to the quotient chain complex is homotopy equivalence.
Related Questions in HIGHER-CATEGORY-THEORY
- Quillen equivalence between sSet (Joyal's model structure) and sSetCat (Bergner's one)
- What is an intuitive Geometrical explanation of a "sheaf?"
- $\infty$-categories definition disambiguation
- Applications of $\infty$-categories
- Simplicial categories and simplicial objectcs. HTT Remark 1.1.4.2
- $n$-categories and associahedrons.
- Weak notion of equivalence in a category
- The $2$-category of monoids
- Higher homotopy groups in terms of the fundamental groupoid
- Pseudolimits equivalent to limits
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Sure. Suppose $X$ is an $\infty$-groupoid and let $B=Y=\Delta^0$ and $A=\emptyset.$ Then your theorem says that $K(\Delta^0,X)\to K(\emptyset, X)$ is a Kan fibration. But $K(\Delta^0,X)$ is isomorphic to $X,$ if $X$ is an $\infty$-groupoid, while $K(\emptyset,X)$ is isomorphic to $\Delta^0.$ Therefore the map $X\to\Delta^0$ is a Kan fibration and $X$ is a Kan complex as desired.
Better yet, your statement says that $K(\Delta^0,X)\cong X$ is a Kan complex directly!
This argument is totally contentless, of course; if you've proven your theorem then you've done the core work at some point elsewhere. The technical heart of this theorem is that $\infty$-groupoids allow fillings of "special outer horns", those outer horns whose extremal edge is invertible. This was Joyal's original approach to the theorem, which is important enough that it's often known as Joyal's Theorem. There are many expositions, such as around Theorem 2.1.8 in Land's recent Introduction to $\infty$-categories.