Let $H$ be a degree $d$ hypersurface of $\mathbb P^2$. I want to calculate the integral $\int_H c_1 (\mathcal O(k)|_H)$.
I think I got a proof for this, but im am not sure if I got all the details right. I would appreciate if you could take a look on it:
First we note that as $c_1(\mathcal O(k))= k \cdot c_1(\mathcal O(1))$, it suffices to consider the case $k=1$.
If we denote by $i$ the inclusion map, then $\mathcal O(1)|_C$ The integral above is the pairing $$\langle c_1(i^*\mathcal O(1)),[H]\rangle = \langle i^*c_1(\mathcal O(1)),[H]\rangle= \langle c_1(\mathcal O(1)),i_*[H]\rangle.$$
- $i_*[H]$ is Poincaré dual to $c_1(\mathcal O[H])$. As $H$ is of degree $d$, we have $\mathcal O[H])=\mathcal O(d)$. Thus $$\langle c_1(i^*\mathcal O(1)),[H]\rangle = \langle c_1(\mathcal O(1))\cup c_1(\mathcal O(d)),[\mathbb P^2]\rangle $$
- As further $c_1(\mathcal O(1))$ is Poincaré dual to a linear hyperplane which intersects the degree $d$ hypersurface $H$ in exactly $d$ points (counting multiplicities), the Poincaré dual $P$ of $c_1(\mathcal O(1))\cup c_1(\mathcal O(d))$ is the linear combination of these $d$ points.
- Applying the definition of Poincaré duality on the constant $1$-function, we get $$ \langle c_1(\mathcal O(1))\cup c_1(\mathcal O(d)),[\mathbb P^2]\rangle = \langle P, 1|_P\rangle =d. $$
- Summarizing we get $\int_H c_1 (\mathcal O(k)|_H)=d\cdot k.$
Is what I wrote right? Is there a shorter proof for this?
It looks correct. I'm not sure if there is a quicker way or not, especially with characteristic classes, when they are many definitions (I hope mine match with yours). Here is a try :
1) Let $\alpha \in H^*(Y)$, $\alpha = \alpha^0 + \dots + \alpha^n$ where $\alpha^i \in H^i(X)$. We define $\int_Y \alpha := \deg(\text{PD}(\alpha^n))$ where $\text{PD}$ is the Poincaré dual.
2) We define $c_1(L) = [D] \in H^2(X)$ if $L = O_X(D)$. Then, we have $$\int_Y c_1(L_{|Y}) = \int_Y D_{|Y} = \int_Y D \cdot Y$$
Now you are done since you're looking at $\deg(\text{PD}(D \cdot Y)) = dk$.
Remark : If you are working in the Chow ring, it's even more easier since by definition $CH^k(Y) := CH_{n-k}(Y)$, in this case you define it by $\deg(\alpha^n)$. Also intersection theory is way more easy in the Chow ring, see the discussion in the first chapter of the book by Eisenbud and Harris.