In a thermodynamics text I'm reading, the author says the following,
"The integral of the perfect differential $dz = y\,dx + (x+c) \,dy \; (\mathrm{where} \; z = xy + cy)$ from point (0,0) to pint $(a,b)$, over the path $(0,0)$ to $(0,b)$ to $(a,b)$ is
$$ c\cdot \int_0^b dy + b\cdot \int_0^adx = cb + ab. \quad (1)"$$
Later in the text - and presumably using the same integration rule - says the following (here I'm paraphrasing),
"Integrating $dS = \frac{3}{2} nR/T) dT + (nR/V) dV$ gives $$ S = nR \ln[(T/T_0)^{3/2}(V/V_0)] + S_0 \quad (2)$$
where $S = S_0$ when $T = T_0$ and $V = V_0.$"
My question is - where does this come from? I've taken two semesters of analysis and I haven't seen anything like this. In the case of (1), wouldn't one have to integrate the right-hand side with respect to both $x$ and $y$? If so, the resultant should have two terms, each of which being functions of both $x$ and $y$. Why can I integrate each term separately with respect to its variable? Where's the justification?
The integral of a one-form $Pdx + Qdy$ over a curve $\gamma(t) = (x(t), y(t))$, parameterized for $0 \leq t \leq 1$, is by definition $$ \int_\gamma (P dx + Q dy) = \int_0^1 \left(P(x(t),y(t)) x'(t) + Q(x(t),y(t)) y'(t) \right) dt $$ In other words, it is technically an integral over $t$, the parameter defining the curve. In your example (1), the curve $\gamma$ consists of two line segments which are horizontal and vertical. For the first part, from $(0,0)$ to $(0,b)$, you can take $\gamma(t) = (x(t), y(t)) = (0, t)$ for $0 \leq t \leq b$. In this case, $y(t) = t$, so the integral can be thought of as being over the variable "$y$". Similarly, the second segment is horizontal, so $x(t) = t$ in that case. Hopefully this answers your question:
On a side note: computing this integral explicitly is unnecessary, since by the fundamental theorem, $$ \int_\gamma dz = z(a,b) - z(0,0) $$