The following definite integral is obtained directly from Hermite's integral representation of the Hurwitz zeta function. But is it possible to obtain the same result via the residue calculus or another technique?
$$\int_{0}^{\infty} {x \over \left({\rm e}^{x} - 1\right)\left[x^{2} + \left(2\pi\right)^{2}\right]^{2}} \,{\rm d}x ={1 \over 96} - {3 \over 32\pi^{2}}. $$
This integral may be done via the residue theorem, by considering the integral
$$\oint_C dz \frac{z \log{z}}{(e^z-1)(z^2+4 \pi^2)^2}$$
where $C$ is a keyhole contour about the positive real axis, having an outer circle of radius $R$ and inner circle of radius $\epsilon$, each centered about the origin. One may show that the integrals about each of the circular arcs vanish as $R\to\infty$ and $\epsilon \to 0$. In this case, then, by the residue theorem, we have
$$\int_0^{\infty} dx \frac{x}{(e^x-1) (x^2+4 \pi^2)^2} = -\sum_{k \ne 0, k \in \mathbb{Z}} \operatorname*{Res}_{z=i 2 \pi k} \frac{z \log{z}}{(e^z-1)(z^2+4 \pi^2)^2}$$
When $k \ne 1$, the poles are simple. Noting that
$$\lim_{z\to i 2 \pi k} \frac{z-i 2 \pi k}{e^z-1}=1$$
we have that, when $k \gt 1$
$$-\operatorname*{Res}_{z=i 2 \pi k} \frac{z \log{z}}{(e^z-1)(z^2+4 \pi^2)^2} = \frac{k}{16 \pi^2 (k^2-1)^2}- i \frac{k \log{(2 \pi k)}}{8 \pi^3 (k^2-1)^2}$$
When $k \lt 0$, however, we must be careful with the argument of $-i$ as defined by the keyhole contour we are using; in this case, $\arg{(-i)} = 3 \pi/2$ and not $-\pi/2$, and therefore, when $k \lt -1$
$$-\operatorname*{Res}_{z=-i 2 \pi k} \frac{z \log{z}}{(e^z-1)(z^2+4 \pi^2)^2} = -\frac{3 k}{16 \pi^2 (k^2-1)^2}+ i \frac{k \log{(2 \pi k)}}{8 \pi^3 (k^2-1)^2}$$
Thus the sum of the residues when $k \ne \pm 1$ is
$$-\frac1{8 \pi^2} \sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{k}{(k^2-1)^2} $$
The sum may be evaluated by partial fractions:
$$\sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \frac{k}{(k^2-1)^2} = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{k+1}{((k+1)^2-1)^2} = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac14 \left [\frac1{k^2}-\frac1{(k+2)^2} \right ] = \frac{5}{16}$$
Putting this together gives the sum of the residues for $|k|\gt 1$ as $-5/(128 \pi^2)$.
For $|k|=1$, however, we have a triple pole. The calculation in this case is far uglier and I will spare you the details:
$$\begin{align}-\operatorname*{Res}_{z=i 2 \pi} \frac{z \log{z}}{(e^z-1)(z^2+4 \pi^2)^2} &= -\frac12 \left [\frac{d^2}{dz^2}\frac{z (z-i 2 \pi) \log{z}}{(e^z-1)(z+i 2 \pi)^2} \right ]_{z=i 2 \pi}\\ &= -\frac1{192}-\frac{9}{256 \pi^2} -i \frac{(3+4 \pi^2) \log{(2 \pi)}}{384 \pi^3} \end{align}$$
Similarly, and keeping in mind the argument of $-i$ as above, we have
$$\begin{align}-\operatorname*{Res}_{z=-i 2 \pi} \frac{z \log{z}}{(e^z-1)(z^2+4 \pi^2)^2} &= -\frac12 \left [\frac{d^2}{dz^2}\frac{z (z+i 2 \pi) \log{z}}{(e^z-1)(z-i 2 \pi)^2} \right ]_{z=-i 2 \pi}\\ &= \frac{3}{192}-\frac{5}{256 \pi^2} +i \frac{(3+4 \pi^2) \log{(2 \pi)}}{384 \pi^3} \end{align}$$
We may put this all together, and we finally have for the integral
$$\int_0^{\infty} dx \frac{x}{(e^x-1) (x^2+4 \pi^2)^2} = \frac1{96}-\frac{7}{128 \pi^2} - \frac{5}{128 \pi^2} = \frac1{96}-\frac{3}{32 \pi^2}$$
as was to be shown.