The natural logarithm is sometimes defined as a definite integral: $\displaystyle \ln a = \int_1^a \frac{1}{t} \, dt$. Since $\ln(ab) = \ln(a) + \ln(b)$, we have $\displaystyle \int_1^{ab} \frac{1}{t} \, dt = \displaystyle \int_1^{a} \frac{1}{t} \, dt + \displaystyle \int_1^{b} \frac{1}{t} \, dt$.
Is there an intuitive/geometric reason for this?
Here is some hand-wavey intuition, which can be formalized with, say, substitution, or looking at partitions and upper or lower sums.
Subtract $\int_1^a\frac1tdt$ from both sides to get $$ \int_a^{ab}\frac1tdt = \int_1^b\frac1tdt $$ Why should this be true? If you move $a$ times further out along the $x$-axis, from $\int_1^b$ to $\int_a^{x}$, the graph is $a$ times closer to the $x$-axis, so you need to integrate over an $a$ times longer interval to get the same result. This would make $x = ab$.