I bought the book at some old bookstore, and I read the first few pages and it seems quite interesting. I want to learn analysis, but I am not sure if this book is the most appropriate introduction. I was thinking of doing Baby Rudin instead. What do you recommend?
2026-04-02 16:38:01.1775147881
On
Is "Foundations of Mathematical Analysis" by J.K. Truss a good introduction to analysis?
290 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
There are 2 best solutions below
1
On
I recommend 'Mathematical Analysis Linear And Metric Structures And Continuity'. This is a game changer.
From the publisher:
This book is out of print and I haven't read it. Judging from the publisher's introduction, it seems that the word “foundations” in the title refers not to the basics or fundamentals of mathematical analysis, but to the logical foundations upon which mathematical analysis can be rigorously built. (If you have heard about the “three crises in mathematical history” in the past, you know what I mean.) This is probably why topics on mathematical logic or axiomatic set theory, such as Gödel's theorems, Suslin's problem or continuum hypothesis, are discussed.
While the book does touch upon some topics in undergraduate-level mathematical analysis (such as metric spaces), I guess that most topics, notions or theorems that one encounters in a typical analysis text (e.g. the ratio test, mean value theorem, L’hospital’s rule, Lebesgue’s criterion of Riemann integrability, uniform continuity, or uniform convergence) are not covered here. If you want a textbook that covers those conventional topics, you should probably look elsewhere.
I don't know what books suit you the best. Baby Rudin is a well-known hit-or-miss. Many people who like the book say that the first seven or eight chapters are masterfully written. Those who don’t like it criticise that the text is unmotivated and explanations are terse. But most people seem to agree that the last few chapters (especially the one on Lebesgue integral) are not as good as the earlier ones. Personally I love its chapter 2 (basic topology) and I like parts of chapters 7 and 8, but by and large I think this book is grossly overrated.
At any rate, to pick a text that suits you, I think the rules of thumb are: