I know $ (\infty/\infty)$ is indeterminate, but it can't be less than $0$.
So can you assume $\infty + (\infty/\infty)$ is determinate because $\infty + n$ where $n\ge 0$ is still $\infty$ ?
The equation this question is based off of is $$\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{n \log n + n}{\log n}.$$
This is in the context of big O notation. Would this be form be valid to use to determine the numerator's function is big Omega of the denominator? Or should l'hopitals rule be used to find a determinate and defined limit?
This is a very interesting question... I believe you are correct. Below is a proof.
Case i.
If $f$ and $g$ grow at the same rate, then $lim_{x \rightarrow a}[f(x)/g(x)]=L$ where $L\in \mathbb{R}$.
Then, $lim_{x \rightarrow b}[h(x)]+lim_{x \rightarrow a}[f(x)/g(x)]=\infty+L=\infty$.
Case ii.
Case iii.
Hence, in any case, $lim_{x \rightarrow b}[h(x)]+lim_{x \rightarrow a}[f(x)/g(x)]=\infty+(\infty/\infty)=\infty$
In this proof we are using limits to make sense of your statement, but I don't think you NEED limits to make sense of the statement. $\infty$ is simply a quantity increasing without limit... Some folks are saying $\infty/\infty$ is undefined; this is not true. It is indeterminate because the answer EXISTS, only it cannot be determined in the current form. By adding $\infty$ to the expression you obtain another expression that is suddenly in determinate form.