Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?
I'm not sure if the result is true. I checked it for some lower order and I think the result may correct.
But I failed to prove/disprove the result.
Is it true that a dihedral group is nonabelian?
I'm not sure if the result is true. I checked it for some lower order and I think the result may correct.
But I failed to prove/disprove the result.
On
$D_3$, i.e, the dihedral group of a triangle is isomorphic to $S_3$ which is non-abelian. It can be shown that this is true for $n \geq 3$.
Remark: Some people denote the dihedral group by $D_{2n}$ which is based on the fact the order is $2n$, while some people denote it by $D_n$.
On
The dihedral groups for $n=1$ and $n=2$ are abelian; for $n\geq 3$, the dihedral groups are nonabelian (this is mentioned on Wikipedia).
On
Dihedral group of order $2n$ has the presentation
$$\langle x,y \mid x^n=y^2=e,yxy=x^{-1}\rangle$$
When $n=1$, we have $x=e$ and thus it is a group of order 2.
When $n=2$, we have $yxy=x$ and so $xy=yx$. Thus it is abelian.
But when $n\geq 3$, then $yxy=x^{n-1}$ and so $xy=yx^{n-1} \neq yx$. Thus it is not abelian.
On
My picture for $D_4$ shows $fr = r^{-1}f$ and not $rf$.
See Zev Chonoles's exquisite pictures at https://math.stackexchange.com/a/686175/53934 too.

Yes, the dihedral groups $D_n$ are nonabelian for $n\ge 3$. It is generated by a rotation $r$ with $r^n=1$ and a reflection $s$ with $s^2=1$. However, you can easily check that a rotation and a reflection will not commute in general. We have $sr=r^{-1}s$ instead for $D_n$ with this presentation.