I am learning hasse diagram concept. I read that toset means poset + every pair of elements in set must be comparable(ie.., related). If any pair of elements are comparable then there will not be branching right(pls correct me if wrong). If there is branching (say V shape) then 2 top elements on top of V-shape will not be comparable. THen i think is it true that toset will always be a vertical line? pls correct me if wrong.
2026-04-18 14:26:41.1776522401
Is it true that Hasse diagram of ToSET(totally ordered set) is vertical line?
290 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ORDER-THEORY
- Some doubt about minimal antichain cover of poset.
- Partially ordered sets that has maximal element but no last element
- Ordered set and minimal element
- Order relation proof ...
- Lexicographical covering of boolean poset
- Every linearly-ordered real-parametrized family of asymptotic classes is nowhere dense?
- Is there a name for this property on a binary relation?
- Is the forgetful functor from $\mathbf{Poset}$ to $\mathbf{Set}$ represented by the object 2?
- Comparing orders induced by euclidean function and divisibility in euclidean domain
- Embedding from Rational Numbers to Ordered Field is Order Preserving
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You are correct that a finite toset can be represented by a entirely vertical Hasse diagram as you describe. For infinite sets it becomes debatable there even is a Hasse diagram, although the vertical intuition is still a good one since it works "locally" (i.e. for finite subtosets). Indeed, this is the reason another term for totally ordered is "linearly" ordered - because our intuition is that it can exist on a line. The Hasse diagram of a toset of size $n$ is the corresponding "line graph."
For infinite tosets, we can have vertices that are not connected by edges and edges necessarily of arbitrarily small length - for instance the ordinal $\omega+1$, which you can think of as $\mathbb{N}\sqcup\{\infty\}$, or more topologically as $\{-1/n\mid n>0\}\sqcup\{0\}$. This also shows the cardinality does not determine the diagram, since $\omega$ itself ought to have a different diagram. It may not even make sense to say there are edges, for instance what would the Hasse diagram of $\mathbb{Q}$ be? And the toset may not even embed in $\mathbb{R}$ at all, for instance if its cardinality is greater than $\mathfrak{c}=|\mathbb{R}|$.