For $k$ a field, the localization $k[x]_{(x)}$ naturally includes into $k[[x]].$ I can prove that if $k = \mathbb{C},$ then this inclusion is not surjective, and $k[[x]]$ is not even finitely generated over $k[x]_{(x)},$ because $\mathbb{C}[x]_{(x)}$ corresponds to rational functions holomorphic at 0, and $\mathbb{C}[[x]]$ corresponds to germs of all functions holomorphic at 0, and so with some complex analysis you can see the finite generation is impossible. But over an arbitrary field, is this claim still true?
2026-03-28 05:21:45.1774675305
Is $k[[x]]$ ever a finitely generated $k[x]_{(x)}$ module?
61 Views Asked by user960774 https://math.techqa.club/user/user960774/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ABSTRACT-ALGEBRA
- Feel lost in the scheme of the reducibility of polynomials over $\Bbb Z$ or $\Bbb Q$
- Integral Domain and Degree of Polynomials in $R[X]$
- Fixed points of automorphisms of $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta)$
- Group with order $pq$ has subgroups of order $p$ and $q$
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Conjugacy class formula
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- polynomial remainder theorem proof, is it legit?
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
Related Questions in COMMUTATIVE-ALGEBRA
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Tensor product commutes with infinite products
- Example of simple modules
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- $k[[x,y]]/I$ is a Gorenstein ring implies that $I$ is generated by 2 elements
- There is no ring map $\mathbb C[x] \to \mathbb C[x]$ swapping the prime ideals $(x-1)$ and $(x)$
- Inclusions in tensor products
- Principal Ideal Ring which is not Integral
Related Questions in FORMAL-POWER-SERIES
- Describe explicitly a minimal free resolution
- Ideals of $k[[x,y]]$
- Finding the period of decimal
- Jacobson radical of formal power series over an integral domain
- Proof of existence of an inverse formal power series
- Proof of homomorphism property of the exponential function for formal power series
- formal power series ring over field is m-adic complete
- Let $F[[X]]$ be the ring of formal power series over the field $F$. Show that $(X)$ is a maximal ideal.
- Power Series Arithmetic through Formal Power Series
- Diagonal power series is holonomic
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
In fact, $k[[x]]$ is never even countably generated as a $k[x]_{(x)}$-module.
To prove this, suppose $k[[x]]$ were generated by countably many elements $\{c_i\}_{i\in\mathbb{N}}$ as a $k[x]_{(x)}$-module, and let $k_0\subseteq k$ be the subfield generated by all the coefficients of the $c_i$. For any $f\in k[[x]]$, then, there exist $a,b_1,\dots,b_n\in k[x]$ with $a\neq 0$ such that $$af=\sum_{i=1}^n b_ic_i$$ (here $a$ is the common denominator of the coefficients when you write $f$ as a $k[x]_{(x)}$-linear combination of the $c_i$). If $f\in k_0[[x]]$, we can consider this equation as a system of linear equations with coefficients in $k_0$ (coming from the coefficients of $f$ and the $c_i$) in the (finitely many) coefficients of $a$ and the $b_i$. A basis for the solutions of such a system can be computed by Gaussian elimination, and this process is unchanged by extending the base field. In particular, since there exists a solution to this system over $k$ where one of the coefficients of $a$ is nonzero, such a solution also exists over $k_0$. This just means that $f$ is also a $k_0[x]_{(x)}$-linear combination of the $c_i$.
Thus $k_0[[x]]$ is also countably generated as a $k_0[x]_{(x)}$-module (by the same countably many elements $c_i$). But $k_0$ is countable, so $k_0[x]_{(x)}$ is countable and thus so is any countably generated $k_0[x]_{(x)}$-module. Since $k_0[[x]]$ is uncountable, this is a contradiction.