Some textbooks say that proof by mathematical induction is applicable when $n$ is a positive integer, while others say $n\in\mathbb{N}$. Which one of ‘em is correct tho? (since set of positive integers doesn't include 0)
2026-03-26 12:35:51.1774528551
Is $n\in\mathbb{Z^{+}}$ or $n\in\mathbb{N}$ more appropriate for proof by induction?
63 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in INDUCTION
- Show that the sequence is bounded below 3
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Prove that any truth function $f$ can be represented by a formula $φ$ in cnf by negating a formula in dnf
- Prove $\sum^{n}_{i=1}\binom{n}{i}i=n2^{n-1}$ using binomial and induction
- Induction proof of Fibonacci numbers
- The Martian Monetary System
- How to format a proof by induction
- $x+\frac{1}{x}$ is an integer
- Help with induction proof please! For an integer $n, 3$ divides $n^3-n$
- Proving $\sum_{k=1}^n kk!=(n+1)!−1$
Related Questions in AXIOMS
- Should axioms be seen as "building blocks of definitions"?
- Non-standard axioms + ZF and rest of math
- Does $\mathbb{R}$ have any axioms?
- Finite axiomatizability of theories in infinitary logic?
- Continuity axioms and completness axioms for real numbers are the same things?
- Why don't we have many non euclidean geometries out there?
- Why do we need the axiom of choice?
- What axioms Gödel is using, if any?
- Determine if U a subspace of $P_3$?
- Why such stark contrast between the approach to the continuum hypothesis in set theory and the approach to the parallel postulate in geometry?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
As far as the general structure of an arbitrary induction proof goes, the only thing you're doing with the different $n$ is comparing them (you're not adding or multiplying them or something like that). And in that respect, the two sets (natural numbers with $0$ or without $0$) are essentially indistinguishable. You can use whichever suits your purposes best.
Also note that it is not universally assumed that $0\in \Bbb N$. I'm not even consistent myself.