I have been reading a bit more about differential geometry and I'm interested in it from the practical computational perspective. I have seen some places where it is mentioned that you cannot move between different tangent spaces to another without a connection ($\nabla$), hence the need for Christoffel symbols to define the geodesic equation. However, I saw some other practical implementations that seem to imply that no connection (at least explicitly?) is needed to compute geodesic, where you basically have a parametrized curve $c(t)$ and you minimize an energy functional (which seems related to Dirichlet energy) using the metric tensor field across this curve and you get a geodesic (or "one" geodesic given non-uniqueness). So my question is: if you minimize energy using the metric tensor for the inner product, where does the connection or parallel transport fits there ? Is it even needed at all for the geodesic curve computation (or estimation) ?
2026-03-27 13:20:10.1774617610
Is parallel transport or a connection needed for geodesic computation?
110 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in GEODESIC
- Length of geodesic line equals distance between two points?
- What's the relation between the Darboux Frame and the Frenet-Serret on a oriented surface?
- Projection from an ellipsoid onto a sphere that preserves geodesy?
- Vector field on a geodesic
- Geodesic lines of the form f(at+b)
- How to actually find a minimizing path on a manifold?
- Calculating the round metric on $S^n$
- Geodesic equation on a codimension 1 submanifold of $\mathbb{R^{n+1}}$
- How can you numerically approximate the geodesic midpoint of 2 points on an ellipsoids?
- Compute geodesic circles on a Surface
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $M$ be a manifold such that there is a length function, where each smooth curve $c: [a,b] \rightarrow M$ has a length $\ell[c]$ and $\ell$ satisfies some expected geometric properties. Then you can define a distance function between two points as the infimum of lengths of curves connecting the two points. A geodesic is now a curve such that given any two sufficiently close points, the length of the curve segment connecting the two points is equal to the distance between the two points. Lots of things are hard to do in this setting. Even the existence of any geodesics is in question.
So far, no connection is needed. It is possible to proceed further without a connection. However, the above can be done within the context of Riemannian geometry, and it turns out that a geodesic, with respect to a constant speed parameterization satisfies the geodesic equation $$ \nabla_{c'}c' = 0. $$ Equivalently, the velocity vector $c'$ is parallel along the geodesic $c$.
This equation, however, does not use the Riemannian metric itself, only the Levi-Civita connection. It follows that if you have a connection on a manifold, then you can define geodesics using the geodesic equation, even if the connection is not the Levi-Civita connection of a Riemannian metric. In particular, no distance or length function is used for this definition of a geodesic. This approach is important in general relativity for defining null geodesics.