Is the dual/opposite of a Heyting Algebra still a Heyting Algebra? What about locales? I don't see any obvious way to prove it but don't know enough examples either to test for counterexamples.
2026-04-03 08:14:46.1775204086
Is the dual/opposite of a Heyting Algebra still a Heyting Algebra?
139 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
Let $H = \mathbb N \times \{0,1\} \cup \{\top\}$, and define $a=(0,1)$, $b=(0,0)$, and let us see that $a \to b$ doesn't exist, that is, there doesn't exist $$a \to b = \max\{c : a \wedge c \leq b\}.$$ If $a \wedge c \leq b$, that is, $a \wedge b = (0,0)$, then necessarily $c = (n,0)$ for some $n \in \mathbb N$, but there is no greatest such $n$. Moreover, $$\bigvee\{c : a \wedge c \leq b\} = \top,$$ but $\top$ is not one of those. So $H$ is not a Heyting algebra.
Can you see that $H^{\partial}$ (the order-dual of $H$) is a Heyting algebra (it's certainly a distributive lattice)?