Is the exponential map to the identity component of the special indefinite orthogonal groups $$ \mathrm{exp} \colon \mathfrak{so}(p,q) \to SO^+(p,q)$$ surjective?
2026-02-23 08:24:24.1771835064
Is the exponential map to the indefinite special orthogonal groups $SO^+(p,q)$ surjective?
583 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in LIE-ALGEBRAS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Computing the logarithm of an exponentiated matrix?
- Need help with notation. Is this lower dot an operation?
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Are there special advantages in this representation of sl2?
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- Radical of Der(L) where L is a Lie Algebra
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Given a representation $\phi: L \rightarrow \mathfrak {gl}(V)$ $\phi(L)$ in End $V$ leaves invariant precisely the same subspaces as $L$.
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in SPECIAL-RELATIVITY
- What mathematical principal allows this rearrangement during simplifying
- Rocket to a ray of light
- The reason of script expression of $\lambda^\mu_{\;\;\nu}$
- Understanding the tensor notation in special/general theory of relativity
- I am currently reading Special Relativity by Woodhouse, I need help with understanding divergence of magnetic fields
- Didn't understand a step in Einstein's paper on special relativity
- Special Relativity: A showing question $c^2-v^2$ using Velocity transformations
- Form of Lorentz Transformation in 3D space
- reference for special relativity
- Valid Interpretation of Special Relativity in terms of Length Contraction of Relative Distances
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For the special orthogonal group $SO(d)$ and the restricted Lorentz group $SO^+(d,1)\cong SO^+(1,d)$, the exponential maps $$\begin{align}\exp: so(d)~~\longrightarrow~~& SO(d), \cr \exp: so(d,1)~~\longrightarrow~~& SO^+(d,1),\end{align}\tag{1} $$ are surjective. See also this related Phys.SE post and links therein.
Simplest counterexample. The exponential map $$\exp: sl(2,\mathbb{R})\oplus sl(2,\mathbb{R})~~\longrightarrow~~ SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})\tag{2} $$ for the split group $$SO^+(2,2)~\cong~[SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})]/\mathbb{Z}_2 \tag{3}$$ is not surjective. Here the $\mathbb{Z}_2$-action identifies $$\begin{align} (g_L,g_R)~~\sim~~&(-g_L,-g_R), \cr g_L,g_R~\in~& SL(2,\mathbb{R})~:=~\{g\in {\rm Mat}_{2\times 2}(\mathbb{R}) \mid \det g~=~1\}.\end{align}\tag{4}$$ One may show that a pair $$(g_L,g_R)~\in~SL(2,\mathbb{R})\times SL(2,\mathbb{R})\tag{5}$$ with $${\rm tr}(g_L)<-2\quad\text{and}\quad{\rm tr}(g_R)>2\tag{6}$$ (or vice-versa $L\leftrightarrow R$) is not in the image of the exponential map, even after $\Bbb{Z}_2$-modding.
More generally, one may prove for the indefinite orthogonal groups $SO^+(p,q)$, where $p,q\geq 2$, that the exponential map $$\exp: so(p,q)~~\longrightarrow~~ SO^+(p,q)\tag{7} $$ is not surjective, cf. e.g. Ref. 1.
References: