My professor often hints that the Fourier Transform of a compactly supported $L^1$ function is of class $C^{\infty}$. Is this always true? How can I see this?
2026-04-12 20:51:45.1776027105
Is the Fourier transform of a compactly supported $L^1$ function $C^{\infty}$
997 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPLEX-ANALYSIS
- Minkowski functional of balanced domain with smooth boundary
- limit points at infinity
- conformal mapping and rational function
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- If $u+v = \frac{2 \sin 2x}{e^{2y}+e^{-2y}-2 \cos 2x}$ then find corresponding analytical function $f(z)=u+iv$
- Is there a trigonometric identity that implies the Riemann Hypothesis?
- order of zero of modular form from it's expansion at infinity
- How to get to $\frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_C \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} \, dz =n_0-n_p$ from Cauchy's residue theorem?
- If $g(z)$ is analytic function, and $g(z)=O(|z|)$ and g(z) is never zero then show that g(z) is constant.
- Radius of convergence of Taylor series of a function of real variable
Related Questions in LEBESGUE-INTEGRAL
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- Square Integrable Functions are Measurable?
- Lebesgue measure and limit of the integral.
- Solving an integral by using the Dominated Convergence Theorem.
- Convergence of a seqence under the integral sign
- If $g \in L^1$ and $f_n \to f$ a.e. where $|f_n| \leq 1$, then $g*f_n \to g*f$ uniformly on each compact set.
- Integral with Dirac measure.
- If $u \in \mathscr{L}^1(\lambda^n), v\in \mathscr{L}^\infty (\lambda^n)$, then $u \star v$ is bounded and continuous.
- Proof that $x \mapsto \int |u(x+y)-u(y)|^p \lambda^n(dy)$ is continuous
- a) Compute $T(1_{[\alpha,\beta]})$ for all $0<\alpha <\beta<0$
Related Questions in FOURIER-TRANSFORM
- Proof of Fourier transform of cos$2\pi ft$
- Find the convergence of series of a sequence of functions in $L^2(\mathbb{R})$
- solving a simple ODE with Fourier transform
- How can we prove that $e^{-jωn}$ converges at $0$ while n -> infinity?
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Arcsin of a number greater than one
- Complex numbers in programming
- Power spectrum of field over an arbitrarily-shaped country
- Computing an inverse Fourier Transform / Solving the free particle Schrödinger equation with a gaussian wave packet as initial condition
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes, it is. You can see this by differentiating under the integral, directly from the definition of the Fourier transform, i.e., $$ \partial_\xi^\alpha \widehat{f}(\xi) = \int f(x) \partial^\alpha_\xi e^{-2\pi i x \xi } dx = \int f(x) (-2\pi i x)^\alpha e^{-2\pi i x \xi} dx, $$ where $\alpha$ is any multiindex.
You can use a standard theorem (see e.g. Difference of differentiation under integral sign between Lebesgue and Riemann to justify the differentiation under the integral). Just use that if $f$ has support contained in $B_R (0)$, then $|f(x) (-2\pi i x)^\alpha e^{-2\pi i x\xi}| \leq (2\pi R)^{|\alpha|} \cdot |f(x)|$, which is integrable if $f$ is.
Note: Of course, you need $f$ to be integrable, but this is part of your assumptions already.
EDIT: As noted by @Julián Aguirre, the Fourier transform of a compactly supported function is actually analytic, i.e., it can be extended to an entire function on $\Bbb{C}^d$. To see this, one can use the power series expansion of $e^x$. For simplicity, I am here only giving the proof in the one-dimsensional case, but the claim is true also in $\Bbb{R}^d$. We have $$ \widehat{f}(\xi) = \int f(x) e^{-2\pi i x \xi} dx = \int f(x) \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-2\pi i x \xi)^n}{n!} dx = \sum_{n=0}^\infty \xi^n \cdot \underbrace{\int f(x) \frac{(-2\pi i x)^n}{n!}\, dx}_{=:a_n}, $$ where we still have to justify the interchange of integration and summation. But for $\xi \in \mathbb{C}$ with $|\xi| \leq T$ and for $\mathrm{supp} f \subset [-R,R]$, we have $$ \int \sum_{n=0}^\infty |f(x)| \left|\frac{(-2\pi i x \xi)^n}{n!}\right| dx \leq \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(2\pi R T)^n}{n!} \| f \|_{L^1} = e^{2\pi RT} \cdot \|f\|_{L^1} < \infty. $$ We can then use dominated convergence to justify the interchange. Also, we get (absolute) convergence of the power series $\sum_n a_n \xi^n$. Since absolutely convergent power series are smooth, this provides another proof for the smoothness of $\widehat{f}$.