Given the polar decompositions $A=O_1P_1$, $B=O_2P_2$, and $AB=O_3P_3$ with $O_i$ being orthogonal matrices and $P_i$ being symmetric positive definite matrices, is there a nice way to write $O_3$ in terms of $O_1$ and $O_2$ (as well as write $P_3$ in terms of $P_1$ and $P_2$)?
2026-04-06 00:50:32.1775436632
Is the polar decomposition of a product the product of polar decompositions?
262 Views Asked by user87543 https://math.techqa.club/user/user87543/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in MATRIX-DECOMPOSITION
- Real eigenvalues of a non-symmetric matrix $A$ ?.
- Swapping row $n$ with row $m$ by using permutation matrix
- Block diagonalizing a Hermitian matrix
- $A \in M_n$ is reducible if and only if there is a permutation $i_1, ... , i_n$ of $1,... , n$
- Simplify $x^TA(AA^T+I)^{-1}A^Tx$
- Diagonalize real symmetric matrix
- How to solve for $L$ in $X = LL^T$?
- Q of the QR decomposition is an upper Hessenberg matrix
- Question involving orthogonal matrix and congruent matrices $P^{t}AP=I$
- Singular values by QR decomposition
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The singular vectors of $AB$ depends on the angles between the singular vectors of $A$ and $B$; since the polar decomposition can be derived from the singular value decomposition consequently I don't believe it'll be possible to write a very "nice" expression.
But we can try the best we can, which will reveal that the relationship doesn't really have a general form. If we decompose $A,B$ into their SVDs: $$ A = U_1 \Sigma_1 {V_1}^*, \quad B = U_2 \Sigma_2 {V_2}^*$$ then their polar decompositions are $$ A = O_1 P_1, \quad O_1 = U_1 {V_1}^*, P_1 = V_1 \Sigma_1 {V_1}^*$$ $$ B = O_2 P_2, \quad O_2 = U_2 {V_2}^*, P_2 = V_2 \Sigma_2 {V_2}^*$$ Starting from the SVDs let's expand the matrix product $AB$:
$$AB = U_1 \Sigma_1 {V_1}^* U_2 \Sigma_2 {V_2}^* = U_1 C {V_2}^*, \quad C = \Sigma_1 {V_1}^* U_2 \Sigma_2$$
The new matrix $C$ here depends on the angles between the left singular vectors of $A$ and the right singular vectors of $B$, as shown through the product ${V_1}^* U_2$ in the expression for $C$. Assuming we know the SVD of $C$ as $$ C = U_3 \Sigma_3 {V_3}^*,$$ then \begin{align} AB & = U_1 U_3 \Sigma_3 {V_3}^* {V_2}^* \\ & = (U_1 U_3 {V_3}^* {V_2}^* ) (V_2 V_3 \Sigma_3 {V_3}^* {V_2}^*) \\ & = O P \end{align} But of course $U_3, \Sigma_3, V_3$ come from the SVD of $C$, and from inspecting the form of $C$ we can observe that $C$ is effectively arbitrary.