I was wandering if it is possible to find a continuous function, besides $f(x)=1$, satisfying the following conditions: \begin{align*} &f(x)\geq 0, \text{for all } x\in[0,1),\\ &f(0)=1, \\ &f(x)\geq f(2x), \text{for all } x\in[0,1)\\ &f(x)=f\left(x+\frac{1}{2}\right). \end{align*} Given that such a function has to be $1/2$-periodic, I have been trying to do this by looking for trigonometric polynomials of form \begin{equation} f(x)=\frac{a_{0}}{2}+\sum_{k=1}^{N}(a_{k}\cos(4\pi kx)+b_{k}\sin(4\pi kx)), \end{equation} but so far, the only function I can come up with is $f(x)=1$. I think the reason for this is that satisfying conditions 3 and 4 simultaneously is very difficult, if not impossible?
2026-03-31 17:47:48.1774979268
Is there a function satisfying the following conditions:
63 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Related Questions in PERIODIC-FUNCTIONS
- Is the professor wrong? Simple ODE question
- The system $x' = h(y), \space y' = ay + g(x)$ has no periodic solutions
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- To show $\int_{a}^{a+T} f(x)dx$ is independant in $a$
- Is the function $f(t)=\sin(\omega_0 t+\phi_0(t))$ periodic?
- Periodic function notation, need help with a fundamental concept
- Time dependent differential equation system with periodicity
- Let $f: \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ and $\exists \ \ b \in \mathbb{R} : f(x+b)=\sqrt{f(x)-f^2(x)}+\frac{1}{2}$
- Compute the period of this function $f(x)=7+3\cos{(\pi x)}-8\sin{(\pi x)}+4\cos{(2\pi x)}-6\sin{(2\pi x)}$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
We can find lots of points where $f$ is constant by arguments such as the following: $$f(0.1) \ge f(0.2) \ge f(0.4) \ge f(0.8) = f(0.3) \ge f(0.6) = f(0.1),$$ so we must have $f(0.1)=f(0.2)=f(0.3)=f(0.4)=f(0.6)=f(0.8)$.
So let's extend this to a proof that if $f$ is also continuous, then $f(x)=1$ for all $x$, which is essentially making sure that we can get these chains of equal values to come arbitrarily close to every element of $[0,1)$. This is a bog-standard analysis proof, except with some number theory thrown in.
Choose an arbitrary $x^* \in [0,1)$, and let $\epsilon>0$ also be arbitrary. By continuity of $f$, we can find $\delta_1, \delta_2$ such that $$|x - 0| < \delta_1 \Rightarrow |f(x) - f(0)| < \frac{\epsilon}{2}$$ and $$|x-x^*| < \delta_2 \Rightarrow |f(x) - f(x^*)| < \frac{\epsilon}{2}.$$
Next, pick $k$ large enough that $\frac1{2^k-1} < \min\{\delta_1,\delta_2\}$. Let $n = \left\lfloor \frac{2^k}{x^*}\right\rfloor$ or $n = \left\lceil \frac{2^k}{x^*}\right\rceil$, whichever is odd. Either way, $|n - \frac{2^k}{x^*}| < 1$, which means that $$\left|\frac{2^k}{n} - x^*\right| < \left|\frac{2^k}{2^k/x^* - 1} - x^*\right| = \left|\frac{(x^*)^2}{2^k-x^*}\right| < \frac1{2^k-1} < \delta_2.$$ We also have that $|\frac1n| < \frac1{2^k-1} < \delta_1$.
Now begin the chain $$f(\tfrac1n) \ge f(\tfrac2n) \ge f(\tfrac4n) \ge \dots \ge f(\tfrac{2^k}{n}) \ge \dots$$ which, because $n$ is odd, eventually gets back to $f(\tfrac1n)$, making all of these values equal. In particular, $f(\tfrac1n) = f(\tfrac{2^k}{n})$, and we have $$|f(x^*) - f(0)| \le |f(x^*) - f(\tfrac{2^k}{n})| + |f(\tfrac{2^k}{n}) - f(\tfrac{1}{n})| + |f(\tfrac{1}{n}) - f(0)| < \frac{\epsilon}{2} + 0 + \frac{\epsilon}{2} = \epsilon.$$ But this is true for arbitrary $\epsilon>0$, so we must have $f(x^*) = f(0)$, as desired.