Is there a general solution to $a^x + b^x =c^x$ for $x\in\mathbb{R}$?

138 Views Asked by At

I found this question online: Solve for $x$, given $6^x + 4^x =9^x$. A straighforward but unsatisfactory estimation can be obtained by graphing the two lines (on Desmos, say) and reading out the result of the intersection.

Is there a more beautiful solution to this equation that one can arrive at without a graphing calculator? And is there a general solution to $a^x + b^x =c^x$ for $x\in\mathbb{R}$ and $a, b, c \in\mathbb{N}$?

3

There are 3 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

Dividing by $9^x$ gives you the equation $$(2/3)^x + (4/9)^x = 1,$$ and letting $y = (2/3)^x$, this is the quadratic equation $$y^2 + y = 1,$$ with unique positive solution $y = \frac{\sqrt{5} - 1}{2}.$ Taking logarithms gives you $x$.

This solution would not be nearly as nice for general $a,b,c.$

0
On

EDIT: This answer misinterprets the question to be about existence and uniqueness of the solution, not necessarily existence of a nice closed-form expression. I was not sure what exactly the OP wanted, so I will keep the answer for what it's worth.

Assuming $a, b, c \in \mathbb{R}$ are greater than $0$, and either $a \gt c, b \gt c$ or $a \lt c, b \lt c$ then you can still show there is a unique solution.

Divide by $c^x$ to obtain $(a/c)^x + (b/c)^x = 1$. The LHS is either a monotonically increasing or decreasing function of $x$. In both cases, for large positive $x$ and large negative $x$ we have that the expression goes to infinity or converges to $0$. Thus by the Intermediate Value Theorem there exists an $x$ where the LHS equals $1$. Since the function is (strictly) monotonic, the solution is unique.

In your specific example, we have the latter situation ($a < c, b < c$) and the expression on the LHS is $(6/9)^x + (4/9)^x$. Both $(6/9)^x$ and $(4/9)^x$ are strictly decreasing functions, and for large $x$ they eventually become smaller than $1/2$, while for large negative $x$ they become larger than $1$ so their sum takes on values smaller than $1$ and larger than $1$, so it must take the value $1$ for some $x \in \mathbb{R}$. The solution is unique because the function is strictly monotonic, and therefore injective.

0
On

AFAIK there is no closed-form solution to $a^x + b^x = c^x$ in general.

With $x = \dfrac{t}{\ln(c/a)}$ and $r = \dfrac{\ln(b/a)}{\ln(c/a)}$, you can write the equation as

$$ 1 + \exp(r t) = \exp(t)$$

or $$t = \ln(1 + \exp(r t))$$

Thus $t = x \ln(c/a)$ is a fixed point of the function

$$f(t) = \ln(1 + \exp(rt))$$

and you might write $x$ as an infinitely nested expression

$$ x = \frac{1}{\ln(c/a)} \ln\left(1 + \exp\left( r \ln \left(1 + \exp\left(r \ln ( \ldots )\right)\right)\right)\right) $$

Or you might solve in terms of an infinite series in powers of $r$, which should converge if $r$ is small:

$$ t = \ln \left( 2 \right) +{\frac {\ln \left( 2 \right) }{2}}r+{\frac { \ln \left( 2 \right) \left( \ln \left( 2 \right) +2 \right) }{8}}{r }^{2}+ \left( {\frac {3\, \left( \ln \left( 2 \right) \right) ^{2}}{ 16}}+{\frac {\ln \left( 2 \right) }{8}} \right) {r}^{3}-{\frac {\ln \left( 2 \right) \left( \left( \ln \left( 2 \right) \right) ^{3}- 6\, \left( \ln \left( 2 \right) \right) ^{2}-36\,\ln \left( 2 \right) -12 \right) }{192}}{r}^{4}-{\frac {5\,\ln \left( 2 \right) \left( \left( \ln \left( 2 \right) \right) ^{3}-6\, \left( \ln \left( 2 \right) \right) ^{2}-12\,\ln \left( 2 \right) -{\frac{12}{ 5}} \right) }{384}}{r}^{5} + \ldots $$