Is there a paradox that doesn't require self-reference and negation?
The set of all sets that do not contain themselves uses both, for example. Same with This sentence is false.
2026-03-27 02:34:37.1774578877
Is there a paradox that doesn't require self-reference and negation?
221 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
The Yablo paradox is an example