Definition: -Let $G$ be a group and $S$ a symmetric subset of $G$ (i.e. $s \in S$ if and only if $s^{ −1} \in S$), the Cayley graph $Cay(G; S)$ of $G$ w.r.t. $S$ is the graph whose vertex set is $G$ and $a \in G$ is connected to $\{sa| s \in S\}$. The Cayley graph $Cay(G; S)$ is $|S|$-regular graph.
-A graph $G$ is vertex-transitive if for any two vertices $x$ and $y$ of $G$ there is an automorphism of $G$ that sends $v$ to $v'$. Similarly, $G$ is edge-transitive if for any two edges $e$ and $e'$ of $G$ there is an automorphism of $G$ that sends $e$ to $e'$.
Background: It is well known that every Cayley graph is vertex transitive, but it is not always edge-transitive.
Question: Let $Cay(G,S)$ be a Cayley graph such that $o(s)=2$ for all $s\in S$ ($o(s)$ is the order of $s$). Must $Cay(G,S)$ be an edge-transitive graph ?
I'm pretty sure that this question has a positive answer, but I do not know how to prove it.
Any idea will be useful!
No. First take the group $S_3$, generated by $(12)$ and $(23)$. Both generators have order $2$, and the Cayley graph is a hexagon (so not a counterexample yet).
Now consider the product $S_3\times C_2$, with $S$ being those two generators together with the generator of $C_2$. In this case all three generators have order $2$, but the Cayley graph is a hexagonal prism, which is not edge-transitive.