Is this proof of convexity of perspective function valid without using epigraphs? [proof verification]

1k Views Asked by At

I am trying to prove that the perspective of a convex function is convex.

Problem Statement
I'm trying to prove that $f$ is convex $$f(x,t) = tg(x/t)$$ where $g$ is a convex function, $x\in \mathbb{R}^n$, and $t>0$ is a positive scalar.

Proof
Since $g$ is convex, then $$g(\lambda x_1 + (1-\lambda)*y_1) \le \lambda g(x_1) + (1-\lambda)*t*g(y_1) \,\, \forall x_1, y_1$$ Let $x_1=x/t$ and let $y_1=y/t$, and multiply both sides by $t$: $$t*g(\lambda x/t + (1-\lambda)*y/t) \le \lambda t * g(x/t) + (1-\lambda)*t*g(y/t)$$ Using definition of $f$ observe: $$t*g(\lambda x/t + (1-\lambda)*y/t) = f(\lambda x + (1-\lambda)*y, t)$$ and $$ \lambda t * g(x/t) + (1-\lambda)*t*g(y/t) = \lambda f(x,t) + (1-\lambda)*f(y,t)$$ Substituting those into the inequality: $$f(\lambda x + (1-\lambda)*y, t) \le \lambda f(x,t) + (1-\lambda)*f(y,t)$$ which by definition means that $f$ is convex.

My proof doesn't use epigraphs, although almost every other proof I've seen does. E.g. this proof in number 6.

I want to know if my proof is acceptable without having used epigraphs? Thanks.