I want to show that there are circles in the hyperbolic plane, which cannot be inscribed in a triangle. Is it enough for me to say that, since the largest possible triangle is an ideal triangle and the largest radius for a circle inscribed in an ideal triangle is ${1\over 2}ln(3)$, then any circle with a greater radius cannot be inscribed in a triangle? Am I missing something or is this argumentation correct?
2026-02-22 19:50:55.1771789855
Is this proof that there are circles in hyperbolic plane that cannot be inscribed in a triangle correct?
191 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in HYPERBOLIC-GEOMETRY
- CAT(0) references request
- Do the loops "Snakes" by M.C. Escher correspond to a regular tilling of the hyperbolic plane?
- How to find the Fuschian group associated with a region of the complex plane
- Hyperbolic circles in the hyperbolic model
- Area of an hyperbolic triangle made by two geodesic and an horocycle
- Concavity of distance to the boundary in Riemannian manifolds
- Differential Equation of Circles orthogonal to a fixed Circle
- Is there a volume formula for hyperbolic tetrahedron
- Can you generalize the Triangle group to other polygons?
- Is this proof that there are circles in hyperbolic plane that cannot be inscribed in a triangle correct?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Yes, the argument is sound.
Of course strictly speaking it depends on what you can build upon, to make sure the argument is not cyclic. But all of the things you need to assume appear readily provable using more fundamental arguments, so while I'm sure this would require more work in a formal proof system, I as a human am content with the argument.
Essentially you need to show that the incircle is the largest possible circle in any triangle, and that any triangle which is fully contained inside another triangle cannot have a larger incircle than the containing one, and that every other triangle can be contained inside an ideal triangle. I think you see how these facts need to be connected to show your claim in more detail, and also should have an idea as to why each of them is true. If you are certain you could fill in the gaps, that's fine. If you are less certain, I encourage you to actually do so.