This is the famous theorem of Gromoll and Meyer:
Theorem (Gromoll-Meyer, 1974) There is an exotic 7-sphere with nonnegative sectional curvature and positive sectional curvature at a point.
I don't understand the second part of theorem "positive sectional curvature at a point". Isn't it always possible that one cane perturb the metric such that it has positive sectional curvature at a point and we have $\sec_{\min}(M)\leq \sec_q\leq \sec_p$ for all $q$ in a small neighborhoods of $p$?
This statement isn't quite precise, since $\sec_a$ is not a scalar but rather a map $$Gr(2, T_a M) \to \Bbb R .$$ In the special case that $(M, g)$ is a surface (i.e., $\dim M = 2$), however, $Gr(2, T_a M)$ is the singleton set $\{T_a M\}$, so we may identify $\operatorname{sec}_a$ with a scalar and hence view $\operatorname{sec}$ as a function $M \to \Bbb R$, namely, the Gaussian curvature, $K$, and hence interpret the inequalities in the quotation in the usual way.
A standard partition-of-unity argument shows that for any smooth surface $(M, g)$ and point $p \in M$ one can deform $g$ to $g'$ in some neighborhood of $p$ so that for all $q$ in some (a priori possibly smaller) neighborhood we have $\inf K(g) \leq K'_q \leq K'_p$, where $K'$ is the Gaussian curvature of $g'$. (See Jason DeVito's good answer for details of this argument.)
This result, however, is manifestly local, and it does not guarantee the global conclusion that $K'_a \geq \inf K(M)$ for all $a \in M$.
In short, the existence of a metric on a given manifold with nonnegative sectional curvature does not imply the existence of a metric on the same manifold with nonnegative sectional curvature at a point and positive sectional curvature at some point.