Is there any nice group action to see why groups $S_2 \times S_4$ and $S_2 \wr S_3$ of order 48 are isomorphic? Or is this "just" an abstract property which becomes invisible when we switch to permutation groups?
2026-03-24 23:44:38.1774395878
On
Isomorphisms of two subgroups in $S_6$
210 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
2
There are 2 best solutions below
0
On
If $G = S_2 \wr S_3$, then $Z(G) = \langle (1,2)(3,4)(5,6) \rangle$, which clearly does not intersect $A_6$, so $G = Z(G) \times (G \cap A_6)$. It is not too hard to show that $G \cap A_6 \cong S_4$ - for example, it must have $4$ Sylow $43$-subgroups, and you could consider the conjugation action on them.
It's normal that it's not so visible since they are not isomorphic as permutation groups (one is transitive and not the other).
You can still view it as follows: first, you view $S_2\wr S_3$ as the stabilizer of some unordered partition $\mathcal{P}$ of the 6-element set $X_6$ into 3 2-element blocks. Then you consider the set $K$ of unordered partitions $\mathcal{Q}$ of $X_6$ into 2 3-elements sets that are "orthogonal" to $\mathcal{P}$, in the sense that for every $(P,Q)\in\mathcal{P}\times\mathcal{Q}$, $P\cap Q$ is a singleton. Then you can see that $K$ has cardinal 4. Since $S_2\wr S_3$ acts on $K$, this yields a homomorphism $S_2\wr S_3$ into $\mathfrak{S}(K)\simeq S_4$. On the other hand, the signature map yields a homomorphism $S_2\wr S_3\to S_2$. Finally, combining these two, you can check that the resulting homomophism $S_2\wr S_3\to S_2\times S_4$ is injective; hence by cardinality it's an isomorphism.