The number of nonisomorphic groups of order $n$ is usually called $\nu(n)$. I found a very good survey about the values. $\nu(n)$ is completely known absolutely up to $n=2047$, and for many other values of $n$ too (for squarefree n, there is a formula).
In general, however, $\nu$ is very hard to calculate.
So, I would like to at least have easy to calculate lower and upper bounds for $\nu$. Are such bounds known?
On
Geoff's answer is exactly correct, but I wanted to give the specifics.
If you only want bounds that are easy to compute without being able to prove them yourself, then this answer should be just fine. The bounds are easy and reasonably tight. If you want to understand the proofs (which are not too bad, and involve many fun areas of finite groups), then read the book: Blackburn–Neumann–Venkataraman (2007).
Pyber (1993) showed that for $f(n)$ the number of isomorphism classes of groups of order $n$:
$$f(n) \leq n^{(2/27)\mu(n)^2+O(\mu(n)^{3/2})}$$
where $\mu(n) \leq \log_2(n)$ is the highest power of any prime dividing $n$. When $\mu(n)=1$ you have the square-free case you mentioned, and when $n=p^k$, then $k=\mu(n)$ and the bound is asymptotically sharp. For $p$-groups, pretty decent but slightly weaker bounds were first proven in Higman (1960), and improved in Sims (1965).
The best lower bounds that aren't ridiculously complex to compute and that I can think of just follow from $f(k) \leq f(n)$ if $k$ divides $n$. In other words, count the nilpotent groups of that order as a lower bound. For reference an explicit form of Higman's lower bound is:
$$f(p^k) \geq p^{\tfrac{2}{27} k^2(k-6)}$$
All of these results and more are explained very nicely in the book Blackburn–Neumann–Venkataraman (2007). I recommend it highly.
The number of $p$-groups of order $p^{n}$ is (asymptotically) around $p^{ \frac{2 n^{3}}{27}}$. This suggests that one can't expect to do better than $n^{c\log(n)^{2}}$ for some constant $c$, for the number of isomorphism types of groups of order $n.$ I don't know whether such a bound has been conjectured ( or shown to be wrong), but this is the sort of bound I would expect, and a proof (or otherwise) might be accessible, given CFSG. If I was looking seriously into this, I would check the papers of L. Pyber ( some work was done on this sort of thing several years ago by P.M. Neumann).