what is the laplace transform of $\frac{1}{t}$? I tried different ways like integrating by parts from the general form of laplace but it's getting more complex as my solution goes by.
2026-04-12 12:36:06.1775997366
Laplace Transformations of $\frac{1}{t}$
82 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LAPLACE-TRANSFORM
- Solution to ODE with Dirac Delta satisfies ODE
- Calculating an inverse Laplace transform
- Laplace Transform working out
- How to solve the integral equation $f(x) = \int_0^x f(x-y)k(x,y)dy+g(x)$ for $f(x)$?
- Laplace Transform for an Initial Value Problem
- Laplace transform of a one-sided full-wave rectified...
- Laplace transform for the solution of a system of differential equations with no constant coefficients
- Question about Dirac comb
- Using Laplace transforms to solve a differential equation
- Prove $\int_0^{\infty} \frac{\cos xt}{1+t^2} dt = \frac{\pi}{2}e^{-x}$ by using Laplace Transform
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I may help you with that:
I was working with those kind of function today (1/X) and (1/X). And I must say that the we must remember one of the first transformation we did.
Remember that $L\left\{ H(x) \right\} =\frac { 1 }{ s }$ where $H(x)$ is the heavisde function, then If that is truth, the next thing to do is to write the anti-laplace transform definition: $$H(x)=\int _{ 0 }^{ \infty }{ \frac { 1 }{ s } } { e }^{ sx }ds$$ Well, this expression is "very" similar to the one that we are trying to figure out, and it gets better, we only have to make two more steps to get the expression of the laplace transform of (1/X): First: lest make a doble change of vars: where there is a X we will put a S, and where there is a S we will put a X.
The resultant expression is: $$H(s)=\int _{ 0 }^{ \infty }{ \frac { 1 }{ x } } { e }^{ sx }dx$$ Second, where there is a S we will put -S, the resultan expression is: $$H(-s)=\int _{ 0 }^{ \infty }{ \frac { 1 }{ x } } { e }^{ -sx }dx$$ This means that the $$H(-s)=L\left(\frac { 1 }{ x } \right)$$
$H(-s)$ is the function that is equally to $1$ from $-\infty$ to $s=0$, from $s=0$ to $\infty$ the function is NULL.