I am dealing with the following equation \begin{equation} \lambda\nabla^2f(r)=f(r) \end{equation} where $f(r)$ is a function only of the radius $r$ in spherical coordinates and $\nabla^2$ is the Laplacian operator. Using that $f(r)$ doesn't depend on $\theta$ and $\phi$, the Laplacian of $f(r)$ can be then written as \begin{equation} \nabla^2f(r)=\dfrac{d^2f}{dr^2}+\dfrac{2}{r}\dfrac{df}{dr} \equiv f''(r)+\dfrac{2}{r}f'(r) \end{equation} Putting this in the first equation and giving it to Mathematica or WolframAlpha, it says that the solution is \begin{equation} f(r)=C_1\dfrac{\sqrt{\lambda}\;e^{r/\sqrt{\lambda}}}{r}+C_2 \dfrac{e^{-r/\sqrt{\lambda}}}{r} \end{equation} where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are arbitrary integration constants, fixed by the boundary conditions (not interested in them now). However, If I take the Fourier Transform on both sides, \begin{equation} f(r)=\int \dfrac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^3}\hat f(k)e^{ikr} \end{equation} the only information this gives is $-k^2=\lambda$, since $\hat f(k)$ appears in both side of the equation. How can the solution be derived via Fourier Transform?
2026-04-01 17:46:54.1775065614
Laplacian and Fourier Transform in a differential equation
1k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in FOURIER-TRANSFORM
- Proof of Fourier transform of cos$2\pi ft$
- Find the convergence of series of a sequence of functions in $L^2(\mathbb{R})$
- solving a simple ODE with Fourier transform
- How can we prove that $e^{-jωn}$ converges at $0$ while n -> infinity?
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Arcsin of a number greater than one
- Complex numbers in programming
- Power spectrum of field over an arbitrarily-shaped country
- Computing an inverse Fourier Transform / Solving the free particle Schrödinger equation with a gaussian wave packet as initial condition
Related Questions in LAPLACIAN
- Polar Brownian motion not recovering polar Laplacian?
- Trivial demonstration. $\nabla J(r,t)=\frac{\hbar}{im}\nabla\psi^{*}\nabla\psi+\frac{\hbar}{im}\psi\nabla^2\psi$
- Bochner nonnegativity theorem for Laplace-Beltrami eigenfunctions?
- Physicists construct their potentials starting from the Laplace equation, why they do not use another differential operator, like theta Θ?
- Integral of the Laplacian of a function that is constant on the sphere
- Trying to show 9 point laplacian equivalence
- Does the laplacian operator work on time as well as spacial variables?
- Find the Green's function $G(\mathbf{x},\xi)$, such that $\nabla^2G = \delta(\mathbf{x}-\xi)$
- Laplace-Beltrami operator in $\mathbb{R}^m$
- demonstration of vector laplacian in cartesian coordinates
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
With your permission I will rewrite the initial equation in the form $$\nabla^2f(r)=m^2f(r)$$
First, from the Laplace equation in spheric coordinates $$\Delta f(r)=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{d}{dr}\Bigl(r^2\frac{d}{dr}f(r)\Bigr)=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{d}{dr}\Bigl(r^2\frac{d}{dr}(rf(r)\frac{1}{r})\Bigr)=\frac{1}{r^2}\frac{d}{dr}\Bigl(r\frac{d}{dr}(rf(r))-rf(r)\Bigr)=\frac{1}{r}\frac{d^2}{dr^2}(rf(r))=m^2f(r)\Rightarrow rf(r)=C_1e^{-mr}+C_2e^{mr}$$
$f(r)$ is defined for all $r$, except for $r=0$ and $r=\infty$, where the function has singularities.
In many cases a Green function $G(\vec r,\vec\rho)$ of the equation is required. In our case the equation for Green function (spherically symmetric over $r$) has a form $$\Bigl(-\Delta_r+m^2\Bigr)G(\vec r,\vec\rho)=\delta(\vec r-\vec\rho)$$ $G(\vec r,\vec\rho)$ allows to find a general solution of the equation $\Bigl(-\Delta_r+m^2\Bigr)f(\vec r)=g(\vec r)$ with the right side $g(\vec r)$ in the form $f(\vec r)=\int_{R^3}G(\vec r, \vec\rho) g(\vec \rho)d^3\vec\rho$
At $\rho=0$ we get the initial equation $\Bigl(-\Delta_r+m^2\Bigr)f(\vec r)=\delta(\vec r)$ with the only difference: delta-function is in the RHS. But due to the fact that $\delta(\vec r)$ iz zero for all $r\neq0$ the solution of this equation will coincide with the solution of the initial equation for all $r\neq0$.
Let's find $G(\vec r, \vec\rho)$, and then we will put $\vec\rho=0$.
Applying FT to the both sides of the equation $\Bigl(-\Delta_r+m^2\Bigr)G(\vec r,\vec\rho)=\delta(\vec r-\vec\rho)$ we get $$\hat G(\vec k,\vec\rho)=\frac{e^{-i(\vec\rho,\vec k)}}{m^2+k^2}$$
Applying inverse FT
$$G(\vec r,\vec\rho)=\int \dfrac{d^3\vec k}{(2\pi)^3}\hat G(\vec k,\vec\rho)e^{i(\vec k,\vec r)}=\int \dfrac{d^3\vec k}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{e^{i(\vec r-\vec\rho,\vec k)}}{m^2+k^2}$$ $$=2\pi\int_0^{\infty}\int_0^{\pi} \dfrac{\sin\phi \,d\phi\, k^2dk}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{e^{i|\vec r-\vec\rho|k\cos\phi}}{(k+im)(k-im)}$$ $$=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^2}\int_0^{\infty} \int_0^{\pi}\frac{\sin\phi\,d\phi\, k^2dk}{(2\pi)^3}\frac{e^{i|\vec r-\vec\rho|k\cos\phi}}{(k+im)(k-im)}$$ $$=\frac{1}{2(2\pi)^2i|\vec r-\vec\rho|}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{e^{i|\vec r-\vec\rho|k}-e^{-i|\vec r-\vec\rho|k}}{(k+im)(k-im)}k\,dk$$
To integrate we close the contour in the upper half plane for the first term and in the lower - for the second one (to get vanishing integrals along these half-circles at $R\to\infty$) and evaluate residuals at $k=\pm im$.
Finally we get
$$G(\vec r,\vec\rho)=\frac{2\pi i}{2(2\pi)^2i|\vec r-\vec\rho|}\frac{e^{-m|\vec r-\vec\rho}\,\, 2im}{2im}=\frac{e^{-m|\vec r-\vec\rho|}}{4\pi|\vec r-\vec\rho|}$$
At $\rho=0$ we have $$f(r)=\frac{e^{-mr}}{4\pi r}$$
It is not surprising that we got only finite (at $r\to\infty$) part of the solution: FT implies that smooth functions which we transform are finite.