I'm reading a lecture note in which the author uses
Let $a,b,c \le 0$. Then $$ \max(a,c)+\max(b,c) \le \max(a+b, c). $$
Below is my attempt. Is there other way to look at the problem and have a more direct solution?
- Assume $a\le c$ and $b \le c$. Notice that $2c \le c$, so $$ \max(a,c)+\max(b,c) = 2c \le \max(a+b, c). $$
- Now consider the case at least $a>c$ or $b>c$. WLOG, we assume $a>c$. Notice that $a+c \le c$, so $$ \max(a,c)+\max(b,c) = a + \max(b,c) = \max(a+b, a+c) \le \max(a+b, c). $$
Your method sounds correct.
Another method I can think of is $\max(a, c) + \max(b, c) = \max(a + b, a + c, b + c, 2c)$, and noticing that each term is either at most $a + b$ or at most $c$.
Yet another method I can think of is writing $a, b, c = -a', -b', -c'$ where $a', b', c' \geq 0$. Then, your equation becomes
$$ \max(-a', -c') + \max(-b', -c') \leq \max(-(a' + b'), -c') \\ \min(a', c') + \min(b', c') \geq \min(a' + b', c') $$
Which you can then apply the same $LHS \geq \min(a' + b', a' + c', b' + c', 2c')$ thing.