Possible Duplicate:
How do I find the delta analytically for $f(x)$ with a degree other than $1$
There is a question, prove that:
$$\displaystyle \lim_{x\to3} x^{2} = 9$$
in linear problems of this type I simplify $0<|f(x)-L| \lt \epsilon$ to look like $0 \lt |x-a| \lt \delta$.
Example: $$\displaystyle \lim_{x\to3} 4x - 5 = 7$$
ends up $0 \lt |x-3| \lt \delta$ then $|(4x-5)-7| \lt e$ ends up $ 0 \lt |x-3| \lt \delta$ then $|x-3| \lt \epsilon/4$ then $\delta = \epsilon/4$
But with quadratics I have a problem with the factoring/simplification...
step 1. $|x^{2}-9| \lt \epsilon$
step 2. $|(x+3)(x-3)| \lt \epsilon$
now I know that I have to make $|(x+3)(x-3)| \lt \epsilon$ look like $0 \lt |x-3| \lt \delta$ but I don't know how to go about it. Any help would be appreciated!
First we give an informal description, and then condense that into a one line formal argument at the end of the post.
We want control over $|x^2-9|$, so we want control over both $x+3$ and $x-3$. First we concentrate on controlling $|x+3|$, making sure it can't get too big.
Ultimately we will insist $x$ be reasonably close to $3$, in particular within $1$ of $3$. Suppose that $\delta \le 1$. That forces $x$ to be in the interval $[2,4]$, so it forces $5\le x+3\le 7$. Now $[x+3|$ cannot be very big.
Note that $x^2-9=(x+3)(x-3)$. So if $|x-3|\lt \delta$ and $\delta\le 1$, we will have $|x^2-3|\lt 7\delta$. Thus we will be OK if we furthermore make $7\delta$ less than $ \epsilon$.
It follows that if $\delta\lt \epsilon/7$ and $\delta\le 1$, we will be OK. More briefly, we will be OK if $\delta=\min(1,\epsilon/7)$.
We described the thinking that goes into the following formal argument.
Let $\delta=\min(1,\epsilon/7)$. If $|x-3|\lt \delta$, then $|x+3|\lt 7$, and therefore $$|x^2-9|=|x+3||x-3|\lt 7\delta\lt \epsilon.$$