Let $X$ be a compact Riemann surface. If $\mathcal{O}(p)\cong \mathcal{O}(q)$. How to see there exists a line bundle $L$ and $s_1,s_2$ two sections of $L$ such that $s_1$ vanishes only at $p$ and $s_2$ vanishes only at $q$ (and with multiplicity one).
2026-03-25 01:29:19.1774402159
Line bundle from $\mathcal{O}(p)\cong \mathcal{O}(q)$
82 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPLEX-GEOMETRY
- Numerable basis of holomporphic functions on a Torus
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Hausdorff Distance Between Projective Varieties
- What can the disk conformally cover?
- Some questions on the tangent bundle of manifolds
- Inequivalent holomorphic atlases
- Reason for Graphing Complex Numbers
- Why is the quintic in $\mathbb{CP}^4$ simply connected?
- Kaehler Potential Convexity
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
Related Questions in RIEMANN-SURFACES
- Composing with a biholomorphic function does not affect the order of pole
- open-source illustrations of Riemann surfaces
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
- Reference request for Riemann Roch Theorem
- Biholomorphic Riemann Surfaces can have different differential structure?
- Monodromy representations and geodesics of singular flat metrics on $\mathbb{H}$
- How to choose a branch when there are multiple branch points?
- Questions from Forster's proof regarding unbranched holomorphic proper covering map
- Is the monodromy action of the universal covering of a Riemann surface faithful?
- Riemann sheets for combined roots
Related Questions in COMPLEX-MANIFOLDS
- Equality of $C^\infty$-functions on a complex manifold
- Diffeomorphism between two manifolds
- Real Lie group acting on a complex manifold
- Question about the definition of a complex manifold
- What does being "holomorphic at the cusps" mean?
- foliation with many tangencies
- Complex Vector Bundle vs Holomorphic Vector Bundle vs Almost Complex Structures
- Proving that $\mathbb{P}^{n}(\mathbb{C})$ is homeomorphic to $S^{2n+1}/S^{1}$
- Fubini-Study on $\mathbb CP^1$
- Is there a complex structure on $\mathbb{R}^2$ such that $f(x,y) = x-iy$ is analytic?
Related Questions in LINE-BUNDLES
- How to see line bundle on $\mathbb P^1$ intuitively?
- Global section of line bundle of degree 0
- Picard group of a fibration
- Hyperplane line bundle really defined by some hyperplane
- Understanding line bundles on $\mathbb{P}_k^1$ using transition functions
- Very ample line bundle on a projective curve
- Local computation of the curvature form of a line bundle
- $P$ is a branching point of the elliptic curve $(E, P)$
- Why does a globally generated invertible sheaf admit a global section not vanishing on any irreducible component?
- Global section $s$ of ample line bundle such that $X_s$ is everywhere dense
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This is somewhat tautological.
Denote $\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{O}(p)=\mathcal{O}(q)$.
Let's show that $\mathcal{L}$ does the job.
Start with the standard restriction sequence:
$$0 \to \mathcal{O}(-p) \to \mathcal{O} \to \mathcal{O}_p \to 0$$ and twist by $\mathcal{O}(p)$ to get $$0 \to \mathcal{O} \to \mathcal{O}(p) \to \mathcal{O}_p \to 0.$$
Taking the cohomology sequence we get $$0 \to H^0 (\mathcal{O}) \xrightarrow{\phi}H^0(\mathcal{O}(p)) \xrightarrow{\psi} H^0 (\mathcal{O}_p)$$ and using that $H^0 (\mathcal{O}) \neq 0$ we get a nonzero section $\phi(1)$ of $\mathcal{O}(p) = \mathcal{L}$ which first of all vanishes at $p$ (since it is in the image of $\phi$ and therefore in the kernel of $\psi$), second it has no poles (since it is a global section of a line bundle) and third must have 1 zero in total since $\deg \mathcal{O}(p) = 1$.
Repeating this construction with $q$ instead of $p$ and using $\mathcal{O}(q) = \mathcal{L}$ will finish the proof.