Is this definition rigorous to some extent or is there any flaw in this formulation?
2026-04-03 22:33:47.1775255627
Line Integral Definition - Rigorous?
678 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in INTEGRATION
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- How to integrate $\int_{0}^{t}{\frac{\cos u}{\cosh^2 u}du}$?
- Show that $x\longmapsto \int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{n-\alpha }}dy$ is integrable.
- How to find the unit tangent vector of a curve in R^3
- multiplying the integrands in an inequality of integrals with same limits
- Closed form of integration
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- Which type of Riemann Sum is the most accurate?
Related Questions in VECTOR-ANALYSIS
- Does curl vector influence the final destination of a particle?
- Gradient and Hessian of quadratic form
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Estimation of connected components
- Finding a unit vector that gives the maximum directional derivative of a vector field
- Gradient of transpose of a vector.
- Solve line integral
- Directional derivative: what is the relation between definition by limit and definition as dot product?
- Chain rule with intermediate vector function
- For which $g$ is $f(x)= g(||x||) \frac{x}{||x||}$ divergence free.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It captures the bulk of the spirit of a rigorous derivation, but there is more to the story. However, not much is lost in their description. Because this derivation is found in many textbooks and surely on many websites, I will not give the full argument there but rather outline it and leave it to you to fill in the gaps or find a proof you like.
Let $\mathbf{x}(t): [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}^n$ be a $C^1$ path with non-vanishing first derivative for $t \in [a,b]$, and let $\mathbf{F}: \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R}^n$ be a vector field. Let $a=t_0<\cdots<t_k<\cdots<t_n=b$ be a partition of $[a,b]$. Consider the sum $$ \sum_{k=1}^n \mathbf{F}(\mathbf{x}(t_k^*)) \cdot \Delta \mathbf{x}_k $$ Now use the definition of the derivative $\mathbf{x}'(t)$ to show that when $\Delta t_k= t_k - t_{k-1} \approx 0$ and for appropriate $t_{k-1} \leq t_k^* \leq t_k$ that $\mathbf{x}'(t_k^*) \approx \Delta \mathbf{x}_k/\Delta t_k$. Then $$ \sum_{k=1}^n \mathbf{F}(\mathbf{x}(t_k^*)) \cdot \Delta \mathbf{x}_k \approx \sum_{k=1}^n \mathbf{F}(\mathbf{x}(t_k^*)) \cdot \mathbf{x}'(t_k^*)\Delta t_k $$ Then show that $$ \lim_{\|\Delta t_k\|\to 0} \sum_{k=1}^n \mathbf{F}(\mathbf{x}(t_k^*)) \cdot \mathbf{x}'(t_k^*)\Delta t_k $$ converges to $$ \int_a^b \mathbf{F}(\mathbf{x}(t)) \cdot \mathbf{x}'(t) \;dt $$ which will what you will define as $\displaystyle\int_C \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{s}$.
Maybe looking over this outline of a proof, you can see all the essential ideas: breaking the path into smaller pieces, approximating the change over these straight line segments, then totaling them up. The rest is just details: making the $\approx$ and convergences justifiable. If you do try to fill in the proof, I'd recommend carefully keeping track of the mesh of the partition and use the Mean Value Theorems. Note the statement was for one 'smooth' path, but you can modify the proof with a bit more effort to prove this for piecewise smooth curves.