$X$ is a locally convex space and $X^*$ is its dual space with weak* topology or uniform topology. If $H$ is a linear subspace of $X^*$ such that $\bar H \ne X^*$, then is there a non-zero $x \in X$ such that $f(x)=0$ for all $f \in H$?
2026-03-27 14:45:13.1774622713
linear subspace of dual space
662 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in LOCALLY-CONVEX-SPACES
- The finest locally convex topology is not metrizable
- Non-Hausdorff topology on the germs of holomorphic functions
- Topological isomorphism between $C^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) = \lim_{\leftarrow}{C^{k}([-k, k])}$
- It is always possible to define a topology in a vector space endow with a semi-norm?
- How do I prove the Local intersection property in the example(Economics)
- Why is $e \in C$ (a commutative subalgebra of $A$)?
- The space of measurable functions is Frechet?
- tensor product of locally convex spaces
- Locally convex inductive limit topology versus cofinal topology
- A problem with Theorem 6.4 in Rudin's Functional Analysis
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
For the weak$^\ast$-topology the answer is yes.
Two very similar ways of seeing it, both using the fact(*) that $\psi\colon X^\ast \to \mathbb{C}$ is weak$^\ast$-continuous if and only if there is $x \in X$ such that for all $f \in X^\ast$ we have $\psi(f) = f(x)$: $\DeclareMathOperator{\re}{Re}\DeclareMathOperator{\ev}{ev}$
Let $g \in X^\ast \smallsetminus \bar{H}$. By the Hahn-Banach separation theorem there exists a weak$^\ast$-continuous linear functional $\psi: X^\ast \to \mathbb{C}$ such that $\re\psi(h) \lt \re\psi(g)$ for all $h \in \bar{H}$ since $\bar{H}$ is closed and convex and $g \notin \bar{H}$. Since $\bar{H}$ is a linear subspace, it follows that $\psi(h) = 0$ for all $h \in \bar{H}$. But there is $x \in X$ such that $\psi(f) = f(x)$ and $\re{g}(x) = \re\psi(g) \gt 0$, so $x \neq 0$.
The quotient space $Q = X^\ast / \bar{H}$ is a non-zero Hausdorff locally convex vector space and $\pi\colon X^\ast \to X^\ast/\bar{H}$ is continuous. By Hahn–Banach $Q$ admits a non-zero continuous linear functional $\varphi \in Q^\ast$. Since $\pi$ is onto, $\varphi \circ \pi \in X^\ast$ is non-zero and it is continuous as a composition of continuous maps. By definition $\varphi \circ \pi$ annihilates $\bar{H}$ and since every weak$^\ast$-continuous linear functional on $X^\ast$ is of the form $f \mapsto f(x)$ for some $x \in X$, we're done: $\varphi\circ\pi(f) = f(x)$ for some $x \in X$ and $x$ can't be zero because $\varphi\circ\pi$ is non-zero, and we have $h(x) = (\varphi\circ\pi)(h) = 0$ for all $h \in \bar{H}$.
(*) To see this, note that weak$^\ast$-continuity of $\psi$ implies that there are points $x_{1},\ldots, x_{n} \in X$ such that $$ \lvert\psi(f)\rvert \leq \max_{i=1,\ldots,n}\lvert f(x_i)\rvert $$ for all $f \in X^{\ast}$. This shows in particular that $\bigcap_{i = 1}^{n} \ker(\ev_{x_{i}}) \subset \ker \psi$ and this happens if and only if $\psi$ is a linear combination of the $\ev_{x_i}$: consider the subspace $$ V = \left\{ \big(f(x_1), \ldots, f(x_n)\big) \,:\, f \in X^{\ast} \right\} \subset \mathbb{C}^{n}. $$ The functional $\tilde{\psi}: V \to \mathbb{C}$ given by $\left(f(x_1), \ldots, f(x_n)\right) \mapsto \psi(f)$ is well-defined and thus it extends to a linear functional of the form $(v_1,\ldots,v_{n}) \mapsto \sum_{i=1}^{n} \alpha_{i} v_{i}$, which shows that $\psi = \sum_{i=1}^{n} \alpha_{i} \ev_{x_i} = \ev_{\alpha_{1}x_{1} + \cdots + \alpha_{n}x_{n}}$, so $\psi = \ev_x$ with $x = \alpha_{1}x_{1} + \cdots + \alpha_{n}x_{n}$.
Added: Now that the terminology on the uniform topology was clarified, let me answer this part negatively.
Let $X^\ast$ be the dual space of a non-reflexive Banach space $X$, e.g. $X = c_0$. The uniform topology on $X^\ast$ is simply the norm-topology on $X^\ast$ because every seminorm $p(f) = \sup_{x \in B}|f(x)|$ with bounded $B \subset X$ is dominated by (or equal to) a multiple of the norm $\lVert\,\cdot\,\rVert_{X^\ast}$. Thus, every element $\varphi \in X^{\ast\ast} \smallsetminus X$ will be continuous with respect to the uniform topology, but it won't be weak$^\ast$-continuous by (*) because $\varphi \neq \ev_x$ for all $x \in X$. Since a linear functional is continuous if and only if its kernel is closed, $H = \ker{\varphi}$ is uniformly closed, but not weak$^\ast$-closed. It follows that the weak$^\ast$-closure of $H$ is all of $X^\ast$, and the only linear functional of the form $\ev_x$ vanishing on all of $H$ is the zero functional.