I'm using Instantons and four manifolds by Freed and Uhlenbeck to write a seminar on Yang-Mills instantons. I used Kobayashi and Nomizu's Foundations of differential geometry to fill the gap I had on principal bundles and connections in order to understand the first paragraphs of the second chapter of Instantons and four manifolds where Yang-Mills theory is described. On page 30 however it is stated that given a principal bundle $P(M,G)$ on a 4-manifold $M$ and an associated vector bundle $\eta$ the covariant derivative (or connection or Gauge potential) is expressed locally as $d+A_\alpha$ where $$A_\alpha: U_\alpha\rightarrow T^*(U_\alpha)\otimes\mathfrak{g}$$ where $\mathfrak{g}$ is the Lie algebra of $G$. I can't find references for this. I think it has to do with linear connections on vector bundle and so I tried looking in KN and the only thing I could find is proposition 2.9 where there is a decomposition of derivations on tensor fields in terms of covariant differentiation and linear endomorphism of $T_x(M)$. Can anybody give me a reference for why the covariant derivative has that local expression?
2026-03-26 08:12:53.1774512773
Local expression of covariant derivative on associated vector bundle
80 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in CONNECTIONS
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Conectionless parallel transport
- Holonomy group and irreducible $\mathrm{SU}(2)$-connections
- How is the covariant derivative of a metric, $\nabla g$, defined?
- Different definitions of irreducible $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ connections
- If $\nabla X=h \cdot \text{Id}_{TM}$ for a vector field $X$ and $h \in C^{\infty}(M)$, is $h$ constant?
- Connection on a vector bundle in terms of sections
- Passage in the proof of Chern-Weil method in John Roe's Elliptic operators book
Related Questions in PRINCIPAL-BUNDLES
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Prove that a "tensor product" principal $G$-bundle coincides with a "pullback" via topos morphism
- Holonomy group and irreducible $\mathrm{SU}(2)$-connections
- Killing field associate to an element in the Lie Algebra
- Different definitions of irreducible $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ connections
- Proving that a form is horizontal in the Chern Weil method proof
- References for endomorphism bundle and adjoint bundle
- References: Equivalence between local systems and vector bundles (with flat connections)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The associated vector bundle $P \times_G \mathfrak{g} \to M$ is a vector bundle. Now, a connection $1$-form $A \in \mathcal{A}(P)$ can also be specified equivalently as a collection of local $1$-forms $$ \{A_i \in \Omega^1(U_i,\mathfrak{g}) \}_{i \in I} $$ associated to the trivialization cover $\cup_{i \in I} U_i=M$. The expressions $A_i$ is just $s_i^*A$, i.e. $A$ in local gauge $s:U_i \to P$. We require that $A_i$ transforms like a connection under the $G$-valued transition functions of the principal $G$-bunde $P \to M$. This means that $$ A_j=Ad^{-1}_{g_{ij}} \circ A_j + g_{ij}^*\mu $$ for $g_{ij}:U_i \cap U_j \to G$ the transition functions of $P \to M$.
Now, any connection on a vector bundle can be specified by such a collection of Lie algebra (of the structure group of that vector bundle) valued $1$-forms $A_i$, that transform like a connection w.r.t to the transition functions taking values in the structure group of that vector bundle. But now the structure group and transition functions of the associated vector bundle are the same as for $P \to M$, hence the $A_i$s have the values in the "correct Lie algebra" and they also transform like a connection. Hence they define a connection on the associated vector bundle. Lets see why real quick: The corresponding local expressions $$ \nabla_A|_{U_i}=d+A_i $$ can be checked to be independent of the choice of frame of the associated vector bundle and hence defines a (global) connection $\nabla_A$ on that bundle. For that, we need to transform $A_i$ like a connection and note that the change of frame is precisely given by the transition functions $g_{ij}$.
TL;DR You start with the local expression and show that it is indepenent of your local trivialization and hence defines the global expression. This global expression is the one you wanted.
Edit: Two frames are related by $$ s_i=g_{ij}s_j $$ and you can verify, that on the overlap you have $$ \nabla_{A_i}s_i=\nabla{A_i}g_{ij}s_j=\nabla_{A_j}s_j. $$ You can also take a look at Hamiltons "Mathematical Gauge Theory", it contains a lengthy discussion of these topics from multiple angles.